Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Community Health. 2019 Oct;44(5):1019–1026. doi: 10.1007/s10900-019-00677-y

Table 2:

Description of participants in the AfroPap Study

Characteristics Overall (N=167) In-person surveys (N=91) Online surveys (N=76)
Age, years Mean (SD) 40.90 (12.25) 46.70 (11.27) 33.96 (9.48)

  Range Education 22–65 22–65 22–61

  <HS 19 (11) 17 (19) 2 (3)

  High school 34 (20) 31 (23) 13 (17)

  College 114 (68) 53 (58) 61 (80)



+English Proficiency (n, %)

  Low 38 (23) 28 (31) 10 (13)

  High 129 (77) 63 (69) 66 (87)


Employment (n, %)

  Employed 134 (80) 71 (78) 63 (83)

  Unemployed 23 (14) 16 (18) 7 (9)

  Other 10 (6) 4 (4) 6 (8)


Health insurance (n, %)

  Yes 132 (79) 68 (75) 64 (84)

  No 35 (21) 23 (25) 12 (16)


Marital status (n, %)

  Married 95 (57) 62 (68) 33 (43)

  Separated/Divorced 27 (16) 19 (21) 8 (11)

  Not married 45 (27) 10 (11) 35 (46)


Length of stay Mean (SD)
15.12 (7.76) 15.91 (8.29) 14.14 (6.99)

  <15 years (n, %) 74 (46) 31 (34) 35 (46)

   ≥15years (n, %) 88 (54) 60 (66) 41 (53)

History of Pap testing (n, %)

  Yes 118 (71) 70 (77) 48 (63)
  No 49 (29) 21 (23) 28 (37)

Country of Birth (n, %)

  Ghana 106 (63) 66 (73) 40 (53)

  Nigeria 16 (10) -- 16 (21)

  Cameroon 27 (16) 24 (26) 3 (4)

  Uganda 6 (4) -- 6 (8)

  Kenya 4 (2) -- 4 (5)

  Other* 8 (5) 1 (1) 7 (9)


State of residence (n)

  Virginia 66 (40) 55 (61) 11 (14)

  Maryland 47 (28) 33 (36) 14 (18)

  New York 5 (3) -- 5 (7)

  Texas 24 (14) -- 24 (32)

  New Jersey 5 (3) -- 5 (7)

  Other** 20 (12) 3 (3) 17 (22)
+

6-item instrument which assess individuals ability to read, write, converse in English

*

Tanzania (n=1), Congo (n=1), Tog(n=1), Cote D’Ivoire (n=2), Sierra Leone (n=2)

**

Ethiopia (n=1) Arizona (n=1) , California(n=3), Nevada (n=1), Georgia (2), District of Columbia (n=3), Pennsylvania (n=2), Illinois (n=1), Ohio (n=4), Rhodes Island (n=1), Minnesota (n=1), Michigan (n=1) and Nebraska (n=1)