Table 1.
Clade support from single-locus and combined maximum likelihood analyses.
| Clade | Species | Locus |
combined | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| acon | eno | glyp | Pepck | Pgm | |||
| Clade 1 | D. dyula + D. petitae | 98 | 95 | 93 | 97 | -- | 100 |
| Clade 2 | D. microralis + D.. aff. sycophaga | 100 | 94 | 96 | 100 | 92 | 100 |
| Clade 3 | D. fima, D. kulango, D. abure | 98 | 97 | 87 | 98 | 99 | 100 |
| Clade 4 | D. alladian, D. akai | 100 | -- | 93 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
| Clade 1 most basal | 94 | -- | 95 | 94 | 100 | 100 | |
| Clades (1 + 2) sisters | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | |
| fima clade monophyletic | 100 | 100 | 99 | 100 | 100 | 100 | |
| (fima + dentissima) | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | |
| fima clade clustered within melanogaster species group | 100 | 98 | 100 | 100 | 98 | 100 | |
| dentissima clade within Oriental clade | 92 | 98 | 96 | 87 | 94 | 100 | |
| sister group to fima clade | ananassae subgroup | Oriental clade | ananassae subgroup | ananassae subgroup | ananassae subgroup | ananassae subgroup | |
| sister group to dentissima clade | D. elegans | D. elegans | D. ficusphila | D. elegans | (elegans + rhopaloa) subgroups | (elegans + rhopaloa) subgroups | |
Each cell shows the approximate likelihood ratio test statistic for the corresponding node (Guindon et al., 2009; Guindon et al., 2005). A dash indicates that the tree did not contain the indicated node. See Supplementary Figure S1 for single-locus trees, and Fig. S3 for the combined maximum likelihood tree.