Table 2.
Prognostic significance (cancer-related survival) of clinicopathological parameters using the Cox’s regression model
| Parameter | N | Cancer-related survival | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Relative risk | 95% confidence interval | p value | ||
| Univariate analysis | ||||
| pT category | 105 | 12.3 | 1.7–90.3 | 0.013* |
| pN category | 105 | 5.5 | 2.5–11.8 | < 0.001*** |
| M category | 105 | 18.8 | 8.4–42.1 | < 0.001*** |
| EZH2 score 30 | 105 | 0.4 | 0.2–0.9 | 0.027* |
| EZH2 differencea | 105 | 2.1 | 1.0–4.2 | 0.042* |
| Tumor grading | 105 | 1.3 | 0.7–2.7 | 0.403 |
| Sex | 105 | 0.5 | 0.2–1.0 | 0.064 |
| Age (66 cutoff) | 105 | 1.3 | 0.6–2.5 | 0.488 |
| Localizationb | 105 | 1.3 | 0.7–2.6 | 0.438 |
| MMRP loss | 105 | 1.0 | 0.4–2.2 | 0.948 |
| Tumor buddingc | 105 | 2.5 | 1.2–5.3 | 0.016* |
| Multivariate analysis | ||||
| pT category | 105 | 4.2 | 0.5–33.3 | 0.173 |
| pN category | 105 | 2.1 | 0.9–5.2 | 0.091 |
| M category | 105 | 12.3 | 4.8–31.6 | < 0.001*** |
| EZH2 score 30 | 105 | 1.6 | 0.6–3.9 | 0.318 |
| EZH2 differencea | 105 | 2.8 | 1.3–6.2 | 0.012* |
| Tumor buddingc | 105 | 1.4 | 0.6–3.4 | 0.404 |
*p < 0.05, ***p < 0.001
aEZH2 score (Δtumor center–tumor invasion front)
bProximal versus distal
cLow/intermediate versus high