Table 4.
Comparison of experimental results of different storage schemes
Parameter | Input data (MB) | Theoretical storage density (bits/nt) | Actual storage density (bits/nt) | Error correction | Full recovery | Random access | Redundancy (%) | Cost (yuan/bit) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Church and Kosuri (2012) | 0.65 | 1 | 0.83 | No | No | No | 17.00 | 1.81 |
Goldman et al. (2013) | 0.63 | 1.58 | 0.33 | Yes | No | No | 79.11 | 4.55 |
Grass et al. (2015) | 0.08 | 1.78 | 1.14 | Yes | Yes | No | 35.96 | 1.32 |
Bornholt et al. (2016) | 0.15 | 1.58 | 0.88 | No | No | Yes | 44.30 | 1.70 |
Blawat et al. (2016) | 22 | 1.6 | 0.92 | Yes | Yes | No | 42.50 | 1.63 |
Erlich and Zielinski (2017) | 2.11 | 1.98 | 1.57 | Yes | Yes | No | 20.71 | 0.96 |
Dimopoulou et al. (2019) | 0.26 | 2.14 | 1.71 | Yes | Yes | No | 19.36 | – |
Proposed method | 0.005 | 13.68 | 10.83 | Yes | Yes | No | 20.00 | 0.27 |