Table 2.
3 months | 12 months | |
---|---|---|
(N = 879) | (N = 926) | |
Father temporarily non-resident (%) | 18.1% | 23.2% |
Father is able to help mother in taking care of child** | ||
Rarely/never | 10.5% | 7.2% |
Sometimes | 19.4% | 20.5% |
Often | 70.1% | 72.1% |
Father enjoys spending time with the child** | ||
Not at all | 3.0% | 0.3% |
Not that much | 12.0% | 9.8% |
A lot | 85.0% | 89.9% |
Plays or interacts with the child**(% yes) | 41.8% | 38.9% |
The child likes to be held by**(% yes) | 11.0% | 22.7% |
Helps to soothe the child when restless/crying**(% yes) | 6.1% | 17.1% |
Aggregate Father involvement score | ||
Low (0–3) | 16.0% | 12.5% |
Medium (4) | 32.4% | 34.9% |
High (5–10) | 33.6% | 29.3% |
Predictors of Father Involvement** (Mean score (SD)) | ||
Asset index quintile | ||
1 | 4.64 (2.30) | 5.13 (2.62) |
2 | 4.83 (2.04) | 5.18 (2.33) |
3 | 4.66 (2.10) | 4.98 (2.47) |
4 | 4.35 (1.96) | 5.10 (2.50) |
5 | 5.01 (2.09) | 5.10 (2.44) |
Nuclear family | 5.02 (2.19) | 5.16 (2.55) |
Extended/multiple | 4.64 (2.08)^ | 5.08 (2.44) |
Paternal education | ||
None | 4.47 (2.02) | 5.10 (2.86) |
Primary | 4.73 (2.43) | 4.71 (2.33) |
Middle | 4.83 (2.23) | 5.21 (2.41) |
Secondary | 4.77 (2.11) | 5.17 (2.45) |
Higher secondary | 4.26 (1.82) | 4.83 (2.43) |
Tertiary | 4.68 (1.63) | 5.32 (2.50) |
Depressed at baseline | 4.38 (2.09) | 4.98 (2.46) |
Not depressed at baseline | 4.81 (2.10)^ | 5.14 (2.47) |
Female child | 4.72 (2.20) | 5.00 (2.38) |
Male child | 4.67 (2.02) | 5.19 (2.54) |
Results based on weighted data;
excluding temporarily non-resident fathers;
p<.05 from mixed models that incorporate clustering and weights