Skip to main content
. 2019 Jul 3;8(8):596–605. doi: 10.1002/psp4.12428

Table 4.

Design validation (with the mixed prior)

No. Sampling days Sensitivity Specificity
Besta Evaluationb Diff. Besta Evaluationb Diff.
Streamlined designs A
1 7 + 13 0.98 0.98 0.00 0.96 0.94 −0.02
2 7 + 14 0.98 0.96 −0.02 0.97 0.94 −0.03
3 8 + 13 0.99 0.98 −0.01 0.96 0.93 −0.03
4 8 + 14 0.99 0.97 −0.02 0.96 0.92 −0.04
5 9 + 13 0.99 0.98 −0.01 0.95 0.93 −0.02
6 9 + 14 0.99 0.98 −0.01 0.96 0.89 −0.07
7 2 + 7+13 0.98 0.99 0.01 0.94 0.88 −0.06
8 2 + 7+14 1.00 0.99 −0.01 0.94 0.89 −0.05
9 2 + 8+13 0.97 1.00 0.03 0.93 0.87 −0.06
10 2 + 8+14 0.99 1.00 0.01 0.93 0.89 −0.04
11 2 + 9+13 0.97 1.00 0.03 0.92 0.85 −0.07
12 2 + 9+14 0.99 1.00 0.01 0.92 0.87 −0.05
13 3 + 7+13 0.99 0.99 0.00 0.94 0.91 −0.03
14 3 + 7+14 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.93 0.86 −0.07
15 3 + 8+13 0.99 1.00 0.01 0.94 0.89 −0.05
16 3 + 8+14 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.93 0.85 −0.08
17 3 + 9+13 0.99 1.00 0.01 0.95 0.89 −0.06
18 3 + 9+14 0.99 1.00 0.01 0.93 0.86 −0.07
Streamlined designs B
19 5 + 7 0.98 0.99 0.01 0.94 0.89 −0.05
20 5 + 8 0.99 0.99 0.00 0.94 0.89 −0.05
21 5 + 9 0.98 0.99 0.01 0.95 0.89 −0.06
22 1 + 5+7 0.89 0.89 0.00 0.93 0.90 −0.03
23 1 + 5+8 0.91 0.95 0.04 0.94 0.90 −0.04
24 1 + 5+9 0.96 0.99 0.03 0.95 0.92 −0.03
25 2 + 5+7 0.93 1.00 0.07 0.94 0.89 −0.05
26 2 + 5+8 0.95 1.00 0.05 0.95 0.88 −0.07
27 2 + 5+9 0.97 1.00 0.03 0.95 0.87 −0.08
28 3 + 5+7 0.97 0.99 0.02 0.97 0.91 −0.06
29 3 + 5+8 0.99 0.99 0.00 0.97 0.92 −0.05
30 3 + 5+9 0.99 1.00 0.01 0.97 0.92 −0.05

Diff, value of “Evaluation” minus “Best.”

a

Best = best streamlined design. These designs were identified and optimized from the imputed full model building data set. They were considered as potentially useful designs for future field studies.

b

Evaluation = evaluation of the best streamlined designs. The imputed full model evaluation data set was used to validate the performance of the best streamlined designs.