Skip to main content
. 2019 Jul 3;8(8):567–576. doi: 10.1002/psp4.12411

Table 4.

Comparison of predicted and observed gene–drug–drug interaction trials

Substrate Inhibitor CYP2D6 genotype n AUCR AUCRx/AUCRy Reference study
Predicted Observed R pred/obs Compared genotypes Predicted Observed R pred/obs
Dextromethorphan Duloxetine AS1 17 2.6 (2.5–2.7) 1.8 (1.5–2.1) 1.43 x = AS2 1.28 1.33 0.96 Ref. 10
AS2 16 3.3 (3.2–3.4) 2.4 (1.8–3.2) 1.38 y = AS1
Paroxetine AS1 17 4.7 (4.4–5.0) 8.5 (6.7–10.8) 0.56 x = AS2 1.22 1.72 0.71
AS2 16 5.8 (5.3–6.3) 14.6 (10.0–21.4) 0.40 y = AS1
Tolterodine Fluoxetine AS0 2 1.3 (1.3–1.40) 1.25 1.06 x = AS1 2.62 4.38 0.60 Ref. 29
AS1 4 3.4 (3.1–3.8) 5.47 0.62 y = AS0
x = AS2 2.38 3.18 0.75
AS2 3 8.1 (7.4–8.9) 17.4 0.47 y = AS1
Risperidone Fluoxetine PM 2 1.4 (1.3–1.5) 1.3 1.06 x = EM 2.12 3.22 0.66 Ref. 50
EM 7 2.9 (2.7–3.1) 4.2 0.70 y = PM

AS0, activity score 0; AS1, activity score 1; AS2, activity score 2; AUCR, ratio of the substrate area under the concentration‐time curve in the presence and absence of the inhibitor; AUCRx/AUCRy, ratio of AUCR in genotype x versus genotype y; CYP2D6, cytochrome P450 2D6; EM, extensive metabolizer; PM, poor metabolizer; R pred/obs, ratio of model‐predicted mean exposure change of substrate to observed value.