Skip to main content
. 2019 Jul 24;8(8):1195–1205. doi: 10.1530/EC-19-0324

Table 3.

EI for the selected EI outcomes

EI outcome, kPa Malignanta Benigna P valueb ROCc
Median (range), IQR (n = 77) (n = 324) AUC (95% CI)
SWE-ROImean 27 (3–100)
16–41
28 (4–182)
19–37
0.79 0.51 (0.42–0.59)
SWE-ROImax 40 (11–148)
24–62
39 (6–242)
28–50
0.50 0.53 (0.44–0.61)
SWE-ROInn ratio 2.4 (1.0–15.1)
2.0–3.6
2.4 (1.1–27.6)
1.9–3.1
0.13 0.55 (0.48–0.62)
SWE-Stiffmean 33 (4–116)
19–48
32 (4–192)
23–42
0.96 0.52 (0.44–0.60)
SWE-Stiffmax 39 (11–148)
24–58
38 (6–242)
27–49
0.52 0.52 (0.44–0.61)
SWE-Centermeand 17 (4–51)
12–25
16 (4–88)
12–22
0.61 0.52 (0.44–0.61)
SWE-CenterSDd 8.1 (1.5–31.6) 7.1 (1.3–56.5) 0.16 0.56 (0.48–0.64)
5.1–11.9 5.0–9.6

aExcluding thyroid micro-carcinoma (n = 9) and nodules with missing EI values (n = 3). bTest of difference between median EI between benign and malignant nodules. cReceiver-operating characteristic (ROC) analysis area under the curve (AUC) for the prediction of malignancy. An AUC of 0.5 reflects that the optimal cut-off value yields an even chance of a test being true or false positive, while a value of 1.0 reflects that the cut-off value yields 100% sensitivity and specificity. d49 nodules did not provide data for the 10 mm center Q-box.

EI, elasticity index; IQR, interquartile range; kPa, kilo Pascal.