Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Aug 26.
Published in final edited form as: Gastrointest Endosc. 2015 May 21;82(2):246–255. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2015.03.1974

Table 5.

Advantages and disadvantages to current diagnostics for mucosal healing assessment

Advantages Disadvantages
Endoscopy High sensitivity and specificity
Histological assessment
Management of complications
(i.e. strictures)
Invasive
Only for ileocolonic disease
MRE Non-invasive
small ± large bowel assessment
identification of intra- and extra-luminal complications
Low specificity and NPV
No histological assessment
Unclear cost-effectiveness
VCE Non-invasive
Highly sensitive
Modest specificity
Retention and incompletion rate
No histological assessment
Under estimate colonic severity
Time consuming
Not cost-effective
DAE Visualization of small bowel
Management of complications (i.e. strictures, VCE retention)
Invasiveness and complications
Extra training and time consuming
Utility limited to assessing persistent lesions despite medical therapy

MRE – magnetic resonance enterography; NPV – negative predictive value; VCE – video capsule endoscopy; DAE – device assisted enteroscopy