Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Jan 15.
Published in final edited form as: Pediatr Dent. 2019 Jul 15;41(4):299–303.

Table 2.

Toothbrushing Time (in Seconds) and Pre/Post Differences One-Year after Baseline

Tooth Surfaces
N=14 children who used app for 7 days
Baseline
Mean (SD)
After 7 Days
Mean (SD)
After One Year
Mean (SD)
Pre/Post Difference
Mean (SD)
95% CI* P-value**
All surfaces 40.6 (23.8) 68.3 (34.9) 53.9 (47.4) 13.3 (54.2) −18.0, 44.6 0.38
Lingual surfaces 0.4 (1.3) 13.5 (14.9) 0.9 (3.3) 0.5 (3.7) −1.6, 2.7 0.60
Buccal surfaces 26.2 (27.4) 36.6 (24.3) 35.5 (34.8) 9.3 (45.6) −17.0, 35.6 0.46
Occlusal surfaces 14.0 (8.9) 18.1 (11.7) 17.5 (15.5) 3.5 (12.8) −3.9, 10.8 0.33
Maxillary occlusal surfaces 4.6 (5.0) 8.9 (6.6) 5.0 (5.8) 0.3 (5.2) −2.7, 3.3 0.82
Mandibular occlusal surfaces 9.4 (7.6) 9.2 (7.2) 12.5 (13) 3.1 (13.7) −4.8, 11.1 0.41
Posterior buccal surfaces 12.7 (18.8) 20.7 (17.5) 21.5 (24.8) 8.8 (28.2) −7.5, 25.1 0.26
Anterior buccal surfaces 13.5 (14.0) 15.9 (12.0) 14 (18.6) 0.5 (26.9) −15.0, 16.0 0.95
Tooth Surfaces
N=10 children who used app for 14 days
Baseline
Mean (SD)
After 14 Days
Mean (SD)
After One Year
Mean (SD)
Pre/Post Difference
Mean (SD)
95% CI* P-value**
All surfaces 45.7 (23.6) 119.1 (49.7) 60.8 (58.1) 15.1 (55.1) −24.3, 54.6 0.41
Lingual surfaces 0.8 (1.7) 38.8 (23.8) 10.3 (20.2) 9.5 (20.5) −5.2, 24.2 0.18
Buccal surfaces 28.8 (21.4) 49.8 (18.4) 37.7 (37.4) 8.9 (35.7) −16.7, 34.4 0.45
Occlusal surfaces 16.1 (12.5) 30.5 (19.7) 12.9 (8.0) -3.2 (16.8) −15.2, 8.8 0.56
Maxillary occlusal surfaces 7.8 (8.6) 14.9 (11.1) 5.7 (5.1) -2.1 (10.0) −9.3, 5.0 0.52
Mandibular occlusal surfaces 8.3 (4.6) 15.6 (9.4) 7.2 (4.1) -1.1 (7.7) −6.6, 4.4 0.66
Posterior buccal surfaces 14.9 (13.9) 30.2 (12.1) 22.7 (20.5) 7.8 (18.5) −5.5, 21.0 0.22
Anterior buccal surfaces 13.9 (10.2) 19.6 (7.5) 15.0 (21.6) 1.1 (22.1) −14.7, 16.9 0.88
*

95% confidence interval for the average change between pre-play and one year. See footnote A for exception.

**

Paired t-test, p-value

Statistically significant after adjustment for multiple testing, Holm’s method (p-value < 0.05)