Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Aug 26.
Published in final edited form as: J Clin Pathw. 2018 Jan-Feb;4(1):49–54. doi: 10.25270/jcp.2018.02.00001

Table 1.

Rates of Biomarker Testing Prior to Therapy in Patients with Metastatic NSCLC by Treatment Setting

Nonsquamous NSCLC Decisions in Academic Setting (n = 51) Decisions in Community Setting (n = 253) Total # of Decisions (N = 304)
ALK Test Status
 Awaiting test results 6 74 80
 Did not order test 0 19 19
 Negative 42 157 199
 Positive 3 3 6
ALK testing rate, n (%) 51 (100) 234 (92) 285 (94)
EGFR Test Status
 Awaiting test results 6 76 82
 Did not order test 0 16 16
 Negative/wild type 19 100 119
 Non-sensitizing 7 27 34
 Sensitizing 19 34 53
EGFR testing rate, n (%) 51 (100) 237 (94) 288 (95)
ROS1 Test Status
 Awaiting test results 6 72 78
 Did not order test 0 37 37
 Negative 43 142 185
 Positive 2 2 4
ROS1 testing rate, n (%) 51 (100)a 216 (85)a 267 (88)
Nonsquamous and Squamous NSCLC Decisions in Academic Setting (n = 45) Decisions in Community Setting (n = 282) Total # of Decisions (N = 327) b
 PD-L1 Test Status
 Negative 15 57 72
 Positive (≥ 50% TPS) 8 55 63
 Positive (1%−49% TPS) 5 47 52
 Did not order test 17 123 140
PD-L1 testing rate, n (%) 28 (62) 159 (56) 187 (57)

Abbreviations: ALK, anaplastic lymphoma kinase; EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor; NSCLC, non-small cell lung cancer; PD-L1, programmed death ligand 1; TPS, tumor proportion score.

a

P = .0015 for academic vs community settings.

b

Testing data for PD-L1 was not gathered in the first-line setting for part of the analysis period. Data for 69 decisions total (13 in the academic setting, 56 in the community setting) were excluded from the testing rate analysis.