. 2019 Aug 20;36(17):2484–2492. doi: 10.1089/neu.2018.5939

Table 6.

Unadjusted and Adjusted Multiple Imputation Pooled Logistic Regression Estimates for uGOS, GOS, and GOS-E Outcomes Using All Cases

	uGOS^a		GOS^a		GOS-E^a
	OR (95% CI)	P-value	OR (95% CI)	P-value	OR (95% CI)	P-value
Unadjusted logistic regression
10 vs. 7 g/dL transfusion threshold	0.51 (0.28–0.94)	0.03	0.69 (0.37–1.26)	0.23	0.68 (0.37–1.24)	0.21
Adjusted^b logistic regression
10 vs. 7 g/dL transfusion threshold	0.39 (0.18–0.83)	0.02	0.58 (0.27–1.23)	0.15	0.58 (0.27–1.24)	0.16

^{^a}

uGOS, GOS, and GOS-E were dichotomized into {Good Recovery, Moderately Disabled} vs. {Severely Disabled, Vegetative State, Death}.

^{^b}

Adjusted for Injury Severity Score, the IMPACT laboratory model score, and presence of epidural hematoma.

CI, confidence interval; GOS, structured interview Glasgow Outcome Scale; GOS-E, Extended Glasgow Outcome Scale; uGOS, unstructured Glasgow Outcome Scale; OR, odds ratio.