Skip to main content
. 2019 Aug 26;2019(8):CD004318. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004318.pub5

Comparison 1. LMWH versus placebo.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 All VTE 7 1728 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.38 [0.26, 0.54]
2 All DVT 7 1728 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.39 [0.27, 0.55]
3 Proximal DVT 7 1728 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.22 [0.10, 0.47]
4 Symptomatic VTE 7 1728 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.30 [0.08, 1.11]
5 Bleeding complications 7 2239 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.10 [0.67, 1.81]
6 All VTE (Subgroup analysis open only) 6 1503 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.42 [0.29, 0.60]
7 All DVT (Subgroup analysis open only) 6 1503 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.43 [0.30, 0.62]
8 All VTE (Sensitivity analysis unpublished) 6 1620 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.38 [0.27, 0.56]
9 All DVT (Sensitivity analysis unpublished) 6 1620 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.40 [0.27, 0.58]
10 Mortality at 90 days 7 1881 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.15 [0.72, 1.84]