Skip to main content
. 2019 Aug 22;11:7953–7965. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S215697

Table 4.

Univariate and multivariate analyses for the relationship between the response to the gemcitabine-containing regimens and patients’ background or toxicity by gemcitabine-containing regimens

n (%) Univariete analysis Multivariate analysis
P-value OR (95% CI) P-value
Sex
 Male 102 (60.3) 0.5621 1.39 (0.632–3.058) 0.4129
 Female 67 (39.7)
Age
 ≧65 90 (53.3) 0.4144 1.733 (0.765–3.926) 0.1877
<65 79 (46.7)
Antibiotics
Untreated 93 (55.0) 0.0305 2.444 (1.083–5.519) 0.0314
Treated 76 (45.0)
Severe (grade 3 or 4) neutropenia
Negative 110 (65.1) 0.6975 0.696 (0.293–1.651) 0.4103
Positive 59 (34.9)
Operaion history
Negative 123 (72.8) 0.1148 0.364 (0.129–1.033) 0.0577
Positive 46 (27.2)
Tumor stage
III 15 (8.9) 0.4360 2.321 (0.473–11.392) 0.2995
IV 154 (91.1)
Cancer type
Pancreatic cancer 105 (62.1) 0.7799 0.919 (0.383–2.205) 0.8500
Other cancers 64 (37.9)
Type of GEM-containing regimen
GEM alone 82 (48.5) 0.0700 1.997 (0.842–4.738) 0.1165
Combination of GEM and other anticancer drug 87 (51.5)

Note: P-values were analyzed using Pearson’s chi-square test.

Abbreviation: GEM, gemcitabine.