Skip to main content
. 2019 Aug 21;11:471–479. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S213815

Table 1.

Studies from August 2011 to January 2018 and previously missing studies

Study (English) Country IUD type Max. days to insertion Efficacy population (n) Pregnancies (n) Pregnancy rate (%) (95% CI)a
Turok et al 201415 USA TCu-380A 5 173 0 0 (0–2.11)
Turok et al 20163 USA TCu-380A 14b 66 0 0 (0–5.43)
Akintomide et al 201513 UK Cu-unspecified 5 38 0 0 (0–9.26)
Mohammed 201516 Egypt TCu-380A 5 174 1 0.57 (0.1–3.18)
Envall et al 201614 Sweden Cu-unspecified Not stated 36 0 0 (0–9.74)
Kohn et al 201617 USA TCu-380A 5 101 0 0 (0–3.52)
(Chinese)
Han 200118 China GyneFix 5 126 0 0 (0–2.83)
Wang et al 200019 China TCu-380A 5 50 0 0 (0–7.14)
Li et al 201620 China Cu-unspecified 5 60 0 0 (0–5.92)
Xu 201321 China Cu-gamma 5 414 0 0 (0–0.89)
He 201722 China MLCu-375 3 37 0 0 (0–9.46)
Mei 201723 China Cu-unspecified Not stated 80 1 1.25 (0.2–6.71)
Wu 201624 China MLCu-375 3 78 0 0 (0–4.66)
Wei 201625 China MLCu-375 5 50 0 0 (0–7.18)
Xu 201626 China Cu-gamma 220 5 60 0 0 (0–5.94)
Zhu 201727 China TCu-220 5 96 0 0 (0–3.78)
Tian 201328 China TCu-220, MLCu-375 5 55 0 0 (0–6.49)
Zhao et al 201529 China Cu Y-gong + indomethacin, various sizes 5 26 0 0 (0–13.23)

Note: bdata from reference 10 in addition to 3.

Abbreviation: IUD, intrauterine device.