Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Psychol Aging. 2019 Jun 10;34(6):751–765. doi: 10.1037/pag0000369

Table 2.

Bivariate correlations among the variables of interest at baseline expressed as Pearson’s r unless otherwise noted

Social network structure
Relationship quality
Marital statusa Contact frequency
Support
Strain
Size Children Family Friends Spouse Children Family Friends Spouse Children Family Friends
Social network structure

Marital status
Network size −.02*
Contact – children .02 .14**
Contact – family −.04** .20** .44**
Contact – friends −.06** .14** .36** .32**

Relationship quality

Support – spouse - .08** .07** .03* .06**
Support – children −.09** .24** .37** .19** .08** .21**
Support – family −.10** .25** .15** .48** .08** .11** .40**
Support – friends −.11** .17** .12** .14** .39** .09** .25** .29**
Strain – spouse - −.06** −.03* −.02 −.02* −.50** −.15** −.09** −.06**
Strain – children .02 −.12** −.09** −.04** −.02* −.15** −.40 −.16** −.05** .36**
Strain – family .00 −.07** −.04** .01 .01 −.14** −.21** −.20** −.02 .29** .51**
Strain – friends −.02 −.02 −.06** .01 .03* −.14** −.15** −.07** −.09** .27** .40** .47**

Memory .11** −.06** .14** .05** .20** .05** −.03** −.05** .09** −.03* .02* .00 −.04**
a

Correlations expressed as Spearman’s rho

*

p < 0.05

**

p < 0.001