Table 4.

Standardized results from subsequent latent growth curve model: By relationship type

	Initial memory level			Rate of memory change
	Estimate	95% CI	p	Estimate	95% CI	p
Age	−.43	−.45,−.42	<.001	−.42	−.50,−.34	<.001
Education	.33	.32, .35	<.001	.02	−.04, .08	.59
Female	.20	.19, .22	<.001	.02	−.04, .07	.64
Black	−.16	−.18, −.14	<.001	.15	.09, .20	<.001
Hispanic	.10	−.08, −.04	<.001	.10	.04, .15	.01
Other	.01	−.08, −.04	<.001	.01	−.04, .06	.82
2008 baseline	.06	−.03, .00	.19	.06	.01, .11	.07
Social network structure
Married/partnered	.08	.01, .04	.03	.08	.02, .14	.02
Network size	−.00	−.02, .02	.77	−.03	−.09, .02	.30
Contact frequency – children	.05	.03, .07	<.001	.08	.01, .14	.06
Contact frequency – other family	−.01	−.03, .01	.43	−.05	−.11, .02	.23
Contact frequency – friends	.10	.08, .12	<.001	.10	.03, .16	.01
Quality
Support from children	.00	−.02, .03	.81	−.00	−.07, .07	.98
Support from other family	−.03	−.05, −.01	.02	.03	−.04, .09	.54
Support from friends	−.00	−.02, .02	.97	−.06	−.12, .00	.09
Strain from friends	−.04	−.06, −.02	.001	.02	−.04, .07	.66
Strain from children	−.03	−.05, −.01	.03	−.04	−.11, .02	.30
Strain from other family	−.04	−.06, −.02	.002	.02	−.05, .08	.67

Note. CI = Confidence interval.