Table 1.
Description | Requirements | Benefits | Downsides | Example usage | Design approach |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Environmental conditions are modified to promote the growth of species that perform a desired function |
|
|
|
Fradinho et al., 2016 [60] Korkakaki et al., 2017 [59] Kumari et al., 2017 [63] |
Enrichment |
Species are isolated from an existing community, screened to keep desirable species and/or exclude undesirable species, and then reconstituted into a simplified community that recapitulates the source community’s function |
|
|
|
Petrof et al., 2013 [68] Atarashi et al., 2015 [71] Caballero et al, 2017 [69] |
Community reduction |
All possible combinations of a set of candidate species are evaluated for their performance of a desired function and the best-performing composition is selected |
|
|
|
Hu et al., 2016 [91] Hu et al., 2017 [92] | Combinatorial evaluation |
Mechanistic models of microbial functional capacities and activities and/or ecological models of community dynamics are used to evaluate potential community compositions in silico, identifying one or more optimized compositions for further experimental validation |
|
|
|
Eng and Borenstein, 2016 [99] Julien-Laferriere et al., 2016 [100] Garcia-Jimenez et al., 2018 [109] Stein et al., 2018 [112] |
Computational model-based design |