Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Biotechnol Adv. 2019 Mar 15;37(6):107372. doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2019.03.011

Table 2.

Design strategies to maintain coexistence in engineered microbial consortia

Design strategy Coexistence mechanisms Examples

Resource partitioning Reducing competition for resources E. coli-E. coli coculture producing lactate from both glucose and xylose (Eiteman et al. 2009)
Chemical symbiosis Engineering commensalism via non-metabolite molecules Acetaldehyde-mediated coexistence of E. coli- mammalian cell consortium (Weber et al. 2007)
Engineering metabolic syntrophy Pairing auxotrophic E. coli strains that cross-fed amino acids (Pande et al. 2014)
Engineering mutualism via non-metabolite molecules Cooperative, nisin-mediated survival of a Lactococcus lactis-L. lactis consortium (Kong et al. 2018)
Horizontal gene transfer Promoting specialization HGT-induced specialization of Vibrionaceae populations into pioneers, harvesters, and scavengers (Hehemann etal. 2016)
Higher-order interactions Modulating interaction strength between members Complex interdependences within a methanogenic community created by amino acid auxotrophies (Embree et al. 2015)
Spatial organization Modulating interaction strength between members Spatial organization modulates the strength of cross-feeding between two members of a syntrophic consortium (Kim et al. 2008; Song et al. 2009)
Conferring beneficial/cooperative traits P. aeruginosa surrounding and shielding S. aureus from β-lactam antibiotics in a core-shell structure (Connell et al. 2013)