Table 2.
Design strategies to maintain coexistence in engineered microbial consortia
| Design strategy | Coexistence mechanisms | Examples |
|---|---|---|
| Resource partitioning | Reducing competition for resources | E. coli-E. coli coculture producing lactate from both glucose and xylose (Eiteman et al. 2009) |
| Chemical symbiosis | Engineering commensalism via non-metabolite molecules | Acetaldehyde-mediated coexistence of E. coli- mammalian cell consortium (Weber et al. 2007) |
| Engineering metabolic syntrophy | Pairing auxotrophic E. coli strains that cross-fed amino acids (Pande et al. 2014) | |
| Engineering mutualism via non-metabolite molecules | Cooperative, nisin-mediated survival of a Lactococcus lactis-L. lactis consortium (Kong et al. 2018) | |
| Horizontal gene transfer | Promoting specialization | HGT-induced specialization of Vibrionaceae populations into pioneers, harvesters, and scavengers (Hehemann etal. 2016) |
| Higher-order interactions | Modulating interaction strength between members | Complex interdependences within a methanogenic community created by amino acid auxotrophies (Embree et al. 2015) |
| Spatial organization | Modulating interaction strength between members | Spatial organization modulates the strength of cross-feeding between two members of a syntrophic consortium (Kim et al. 2008; Song et al. 2009) |
| Conferring beneficial/cooperative traits | P. aeruginosa surrounding and shielding S. aureus from β-lactam antibiotics in a core-shell structure (Connell et al. 2013) | |