Table 3.
O…C=O | Erel, | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
molecule | amide | pucker | quadrant | d, Å | ϕ, ° | ψ, ° | kcal mol−1 |
Ac-flp-OMe | trans | endo | αP/δ | 3.19 | −75 | −3 | 0.4 |
trans | endo | PPII/β | 3.10 | −72 | 173 | 0.0 | |
cis | endo | αP/δ | −80 | 6 | 0.6 | ||
cis | endo | PPII/β | −78 | −175 | 0.2 | ||
trans | exo | αP/δ | 2.79 | −54 | −37 | 2.1 | |
trans | exo | PPII/β | 2.78 | −57 | 144 | 1.9 | |
cis | exo | αP/δ | −59 | −34 | 3.7 | ||
cis | exo | PPII/β | −61 | 158 | 3.3 | ||
Ac-Flp-OMe | trans | exo | αP/δ | 2.79 | −54 | −38 | 0.2 |
trans | exo | PPII/β | 2.78 | −56 | 142 | 0.0 | |
cis | exo | αP/δ | −58 | −35 | 1.6 | ||
cis | exo | PPII/β | −60 | 157 | 1.4 | ||
trans | endo | αP/δ | 2.89 | -60 | -34 | 2.4 | |
trans | endo | PPII/β | 2.93 | −65 | 153 | 1.9 | |
cis | endo | αP/δ | −72 | −21 | 3.5 | ||
cis | endo | PPII/β | −75 | 167 | 2.9 |
Calculations were conducted at the DFT level of theory with the M06–2X method and the 6–311++G(3d,3p) basis set in implicit water. All structures are the result of geometry optimizations with the given combination of amide conformation (trans or cis), ring pucker (exo or endo), and quadrant of the Ramachandran plot (α-helix(αR)/δ conformation or PPII/extended(β) conformation). All energies are relative to the lowest energy conformation of the indicated diastereomer. All conformations within 0.6 kcal mol–1 of the lowest energy conformation are indicated in color.