Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Aug 27.
Published in final edited form as: Chemistry. 2019 Aug 5;25(48):11356–11364. doi: 10.1002/chem.201902382

Table 3.

Summary of computational results on calculations on acetylated methyl esters of 4S-fluoroproline (flp) and 4R-fluoroproline (Flp).a

O…C=O Erel,
molecule amide pucker quadrant d, Å ϕ, ° ψ, ° kcal mol−1
Ac-flp-OMe trans endo αP 3.19 −75 −3 0.4
trans endo PPII/β 3.10 −72 173 0.0
cis endo αP −80 6 0.6
cis endo PPII/β −78 −175 0.2
trans exo αP 2.79 −54 −37 2.1
trans exo PPII/β 2.78 −57 144 1.9
cis exo αP −59 −34 3.7
cis exo PPII/β −61 158 3.3
Ac-Flp-OMe trans exo αP 2.79 −54 −38 0.2
trans exo PPII/β 2.78 −56 142 0.0
cis exo αP −58 −35 1.6
cis exo PPII/β −60 157 1.4
trans endo αP 2.89 -60 -34 2.4
trans endo PPII/β 2.93 −65 153 1.9
cis endo αP −72 −21 3.5
cis endo PPII/β −75 167 2.9
a

Calculations were conducted at the DFT level of theory with the M06–2X method and the 6–311++G(3d,3p) basis set in implicit water. All structures are the result of geometry optimizations with the given combination of amide conformation (trans or cis), ring pucker (exo or endo), and quadrant of the Ramachandran plot (α-helix(αR)/δ conformation or PPII/extended(β) conformation). All energies are relative to the lowest energy conformation of the indicated diastereomer. All conformations within 0.6 kcal mol–1 of the lowest energy conformation are indicated in color.