Skip to main content
. 2018 Mar 22;29(3):425–433. doi: 10.1007/s00062-018-0679-z

Table 3.

Summary of thrombectomy trials and distal emboli

Study or author’s name Thrombectomy device N Posterior circ occ (N)? Anterior circ BCG use? Emboli distal to occlusion Emboli in new territory Date of study Core-lab assessed distal emboli?
Current study emboTrap® 167 Yes (23) Yes 9.6% (6.6% anterior, 3% posterior circ) 2.4% (1.2% anterior 1.2% posterior circ) 2017 Yes
MR CLEAN [1] MR CLEAN 233 No Unknown x 8.6% 2015 Yes
EXTEND-IA [2] Solitaire 35 No Unknown x 6% 2015 No
ADAPT-FAST [7] Penumbra 100 Yes (5) No 10% 0% 2014 No
Dorn et al. [10] Phenox (79.8%) and Solitaire 104 Yes (24)

Intermediate

Cath only

x 3.7% 2012 No
Akins et al. [11] Solitaire (61.2%) and merci 144 Yes (4) No 4.9% 0.7% 2014 Yes
Kurre [12] Various devices 105 No

Intermediate

Cath only

x 11% 2013 No
Gascou et al. [28] Solitaire 144 Yes (35) Yes Embolic complication 12.5% 2014 No
Nguyen et al. [29] Solitaire 338 Yes (35) Yes 18% 5% 2014 No
Mazur et al. [30] Solitaire 39 Yes (8) Yes 15% 8% 2016 No
RECOST [31] Solitare 50 Yes (16) Yes x 8% 2011 No
Nogueira et al.[32] Merci/Trevo 178 Yes (12) Yes x 4%/7% 2012 Yes
ASTER [35] Aspiration/stent retriever 181/176 No Yes X 5.3%/8.5% 2017 Yes
Menon [40] Penumbra 27 Yes (5) No 48% x 2011 No
THRACE [42] Stent retriever 83%, aspiration 16% 204 Yes (2) Unknown x 6% 2016 Yes

N numbers, circ circulation, occ occlusion, Cath catheter, BGC balloon guide catheter