Skip to main content
. 2019 Aug 20;10:1799. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01799

TABLE 1.2.

Direction of first look results from eye-tracking studies exploring joint attention using gaze following in young children with ASD or at-risk for ASD.

Direction of first look in response to gaze shifts
Article Participants Measure ASD vs. others1 Additional information2
Bedford et al., 2012 High-risk∗∗, LR 7 and 13 mo. R/(R + D + O + F) Same

Thorup et al., 2016 High-risk, LR 10 mo. LIVE interaction (not screen-based)
R-D Same Response to Eye + Head better than Eyes only for HR but not LR group
R-D/(R + D) Same Both groups above chance

Nyström et al., 2019 High-risk∗∗, LR 10 mo. R-D Same LIVE interaction (not screen-based)

This study High-risk∗∗, LR 15 mo. (R-D)/(R + D) Same All above chance
R/(R + D + O + F) Same

Billeci et al., 2016 ASD, TD 18–30 mo. (R–D)/(R + D) Same Chance comparison not reported

Gliga et al., 2012 High-risk∗∗, LR 36 mo. R/(R + D) Same All above chance

Falck-Ytter et al., 2015 ASD, TD 41 mo. R-D Same

Vivanti et al., 2017 ASD, TD 48 mo. R/(R + D) Less Chance comparison not reported
Same After excluding trials with face dwell time during gaze shift < 100 ms

Gillespie-Lynch et al., 2013 ASD, TD 28–79 mo. R-D Less

Thorup et al., 2017 ASD, TD 38–115 mo. R/(R + D) Same All above chance

Studies are organized by participant age (youngest to oldest) to highlight any developmental progression. R, object referenced; D, distractor object; F, whole face area; O, other areas of screen. High familial risk studies without diagnostic outcome comparing LR with HR; ∗∗High familial risk studies with analysis by outcome. TD, typically developing; ASD, diagnosed. 1‘Less’ indicates ASD or high familial risk participants had lower values than typically developing/low familial risk participants. 2This column contains additional relevant information regarding experimental conditions or comparisons to chance (where appropriate).