TABLE 1.
Scenario | Merits | Problems |
1. Genetic group selection | Theoretically plausible if groups sufficiently stable | Behavioral similarities between humans and chimpanzees not explained |
2. Group-structured culture selection (GSCS) | Likely influenced much H. sapiens behavior | Unlikely to have been important 300,000 years ago. Selection against aggression not explained |
3. Social selection by female mate choice | Female choice currently important | Constraints on violent males not explained |
4. Social selection by choice of cooperative task partners | Male teamwork likely important | Constraints on violent males not explained |
5. Self-control | Stronger self-control in species with bigger brains | Constraints on violent males not explained |
6. Cooperative breeding | Extensive cooperation in human reproduction, associated with low aggression | Cooperating breeding proposed to characterize other Homo species, not just H. sapiens. Selection against aggression not explained |
7. Population density | High population density sometimes associated with reduced aggression | H. sapiens population density apparently low in much of the past. Selection against aggression not explained |
8. Use of lethal weapons | Facilitated control of reactive aggressors by safe killing | Likely too early to apply specifically to H. sapiens |
9. Language-based conspiracy | Facilitated control of reactive aggressors by safe killing | Timing of language skills is speculative; hard to test (relevant cultural practices extinct) |
Merits and problems shown are not exhaustive. See text for citations and further discussion.