Table 8.

Effect sizes follow-up.

Study	Period follow-up (weeks)	Pre–post effect (di)	Pre-follow-up effect (di)	Post-follow-up effect (di)	Weight (ωi)
Baptista et al. (2012) -D	32	0.48	0.39	−0.09	18.22
Bräuninger (2012a,b)	24	0.64	0.38	−0.26	37.12
Cruz-Ferreira et al. (2015) -D	24	2.54	3.00	0.46	7.83
De Natale et al. (2017)	8	0.25	0.39	0.14	3.91
Duberg et al. (2013) -D	48	0.51	0.81	0.30	24.40
Pinniger et al. (2012)	4	0.27	0.82	0.55	11.59
Priebe et al. (2016)	24	0.19	0.14	−0.05	68.43
Pylvänäinen et al. (2015)	12	0.74	0.65	−0.09	7.18
Weighted mean (p)	22	0.67 (0.001)	0.79 (0.001)	0.05 (0.613)	–

The bottom line displays the weighted mean effect sizes across the eight studies and a significance parameter (p-value); D, dance intervention study.