Skip to main content
. 2019 Aug 26;18:1533033819871621. doi: 10.1177/1533033819871621

Table 1.

Evaluation Parameters of NC-VMAT, C-VMAT, IMRT, and CK Plans (Mean ± SD).a

Parameter NC-VMAT C-VMAT P IMRT P CK P
GI 4.21 ± 1.38 4.87 ± 1.35 .001 5.36 ± 1.98 .001 3.49 ± 0.65 .015
CI 0.87 ± 0.03 0.86 ± 0.04 .008 0.85 ± 0.05 .002 0.86 ± 0.07 .281
MUs 3 105.20 ± 371.23 2 997.27 ± 446.84 .065 4 128.40 ± 1 185.38 .002 28 733.59 ± 7 197.85 .001
BT/min 2.61 ± 0.07 2.30 ± 0.23 .001 2.95 ± 0.85 .173 30.25 ± 7.32 .001

Abbreviations: BT, beam on time; CI, conformity index; CK, CyberKnife; C-VMAT, coplanar volumetric modulated arc therapy; GI, gradient index; IMRT, intensity-modulated radiation therapy; NC-VMAT, noncoplanar volumetric modulated arc therapy; MUs, monitor units; SD, standard deviation.

a Statistical significance was tested for each technology in comparison with NC-VAMT.