Table 4.

SVF study quality assessment with the Coleman methodology score modified by Kon et al.

	Study	TOT	Study size	Mean f-up	Different surg proc	Type of study	Surg proc description	Postop rehab	MRI outcome	Histological outcome	Outcome criteria	Assessment of clinical outcome	Selection process
Adipose-derived stem cells	Jones et al. [28]	54	7	0	10	15	5	0	0	0	5	9	3
	Roato et al. [29]	67	0	2	10	10	5	5	10	10	5	7	3
	Hong et al. [33]	56	4	2	4	15	5	5	10	0	5	3	3
	Hudetz et al. [26]	53	4	2	10	10	5	0	10	0	5	7	0
	Bansal et al. [30]	45	0	5	4	10	5	0	10	0	5	3	3
	Yokota et al. [27]	34	0	0	10	10	5	2	0	0	2	5	0
	Nguyen et al. [37]	51	4	2	4	10	5	5	10	0	5	3	3
	Koh et al. [36]	36	4	5	4	10	5	0	0	0	5	3	0
	Kim et al. [34]	47	7	5	4	10	5	5	0	0	5	3	3
	Koh et al. [32]	45	7	5	4	10	5	0	0	0	5	3	6
	Koh et al. [35]	40	10	5	4	0	5	5	0	0	5	3	3
	Pham 2014 Biomed Res	44	4	0	4	10	5	0	10	0	5	3	3
	Koh et al. [38]	40	4	5	4	0	5	2	10	0	5	2	3