Abstract
Background
A critical window in infancy has been proposed, during which the microbiota may affect subsequent health. The longitudinal development of the oropharyngeal microbiota is under-studied and may be associated with early-life wheeze. We aimed to investigate the temporal association of the development of the oropharyngeal microbiota with early-life wheeze.
Methods
A population-based birth cohort based in London, UK was followed for 24 months. We collected oropharyngeal swabs at six time-points. Microbiota was determined using sequencing of the V3-V5 region of the 16S rRNA-encoding gene. Medical records were reviewed for the outcome of doctor diagnosed wheeze. We used a time-varying model to investigate the temporal association between the development of microbiota and doctor-diagnosed wheeze.
Findings
159 participants completed the study to 24 months and for 98 there was complete sequencing data at all timepoints and outcome data. Of these, 26 had doctor-diagnosed wheeze. We observed significant increase in the abundance of Neisseria between 9 and 24 months in children who developed wheeze (p = 0∙003), while in those without wheezing there was a significant increment in the abundance of Granulicatella (p = 0∙012) between 9 and 12 months, and of Prevotella (p = 0∙018) after 18 months.
Interpretation
A temporal association between the respiratory commensal Granulicatella and also Prevotella with wheeze (negative), and between Neisseria and wheeze (positive) was identified in infants prior to one year of age. This adds to evidence for the proposed role of the microbiota in the development of wheeze.
Fund
Research funding from the Winnicott Foundation, Meningitis Now and Micropathology Ltd.
Keywords: Wheeze, Microbiome, Granulicatella, Neisseria
Research in context.
Evidence before study
We used PubMed to interrogate the MEDLINE database, using the search terms (“Respiratory system”) AND (“microbiome” OR “microbiota”) AND (“wheez*” OR “asthma”), with no language or date restrictions, for papers published on or before 1 January 2019 using MESH terms where available. The search yielded 219 articles, several reports show differences in the respiratory microbiota between children with asthma compared to healthy controls. Two longitudinal studies specifically assessed the relationship between the early development of the microbiota in healthy infants and subsequent wheeze. Teo et al, found an association between early asymptomatic nasopharyngeal Streptococcus colonization and subsequent wheeze, supporting an early culture study by Bisgaard et al, relating asymptomatic colonization with potential respiratory pathogens including S.pneumoniae with subsequent wheeze. In the other, Ta et al, compared the early nasal microbiota in children who went on to develop rhinitis and/or wheeze to controls, finding that those infants who wheezed had an increase in Oxalobacteraceae and Aerococcaceae and a reduction in Corynebacteriaceae and Staphylococcaceae.
Added value of this study
Ours is the first study to report the longitudinal oropharyngeal microbiota in infancy and its relation to wheeze. The study adds evidence to the proposition that commensal bacteria may have a beneficial role, protecting against the development of wheeze.
Implications for all the available evidence
There is a window during infancy in which the microbiota of each niche in the upper respiratory tract matures. Strategies deployed in early infancy to modulate the microbiota or emulate its downstream effects may prevent the development of wheeze.
Alt-text: Unlabelled Box
1. Introduction
A number of studies have investigated the development of the normal microbiota in the respiratory system [1] and at other sites [2], postulating that there is a critical period in early life during which the microbiota may have long-lasting effects on future health. This is supported by findings from birth cohorts [3] and animal studies [4] demonstrating that early perturbations in the microbiota increase the risk of subsequent disease, whereas perturbations later on (as early as age one year in humans) do not appear to confer comparable risk.
The presence of microbes throughout the respiratory tract, even in sites previously considered as sterile, has been established with the aid of next generation sequencing [5]. It has been proposed that microbiota of the lower airways and lungs are established by colonization from the upper airways [6]. Studies in healthy subjects have shown that lower airways are colonized (at least in part) by bacteria from the oropharynx, dominated by members of the Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, and Proteobacteria phyla [7]. However, most studies to date have concentrated on the nasopharyngeal and oral microbiota, and comparatively fewer studies have investigated the role of oropharyngeal microbiota.
In a culture-based study, Bisgaard et al demonstrated an increased prevalence of Streptococcus pneumoniae, Moraxella catarrhalis and Haemophilus influenzae in hypopharyngeal secretions in one-month-old infants who subsequently developed persistent wheeze, or required hospitalization for wheeze or asthma [8]. Using a non-culture approach, Teo et al. [9] have shown an increased risk of chronic wheeze by age 5 years in children who had a higher abundance of Streptococcus species in the nasopharyngeal microbiota at 7–9 weeks of age, but did not find the other associations reported by Bisgaard et al. [8] Recent analyses carried out in the context of a randomized placebo-controlled trial of the effect of probiotic Lactobacillus reuteri, have shown that children developing asthma by school age had altered oral microbiota with lower diversity of salivary bacteria and a highly divergent bacterial composition at age 7 years [10]. Furthermore, the authors observed differences in early infancy, with increased abundance of Gemella haemolysans in children developing allergies, and Lactobacillus gasseri and L. crispatus in healthy children. The longitudinal development of the nasal microbiota of infants with rhinitis and wheeze differed from those of controls [11], with an increase in abundance of Oxalobacteraceae and Aerococcaceae in children with wheeze and rhinitis. Conversely healthy infants had a higher abundance of Staphylococcaceae and Corynebacteriaceae. It has also been shown that microbiota in patients with asthma differs from that in healthy subjects (with an increase in Moraxella sp., and a decrease in Prevotella spp.) [5,12], or those with cystic fibrosis [13].
We propose that longitudinal changes in the respiratory microbiota communities in infancy and early life are related to the development of childhood wheezing illness. To test our hypothesis, we used oropharyngeal samples collected at six time points over the first two years of life to investigate the temporal association of the changes in respiratory tract microbiota with the development of early-life wheeze.
2. Methods
2.1. Study design, setting and participants
The Development Of the Respiratory Microbiota in Infants and Children (DORMICe) study was conceived to assess the development of the upper respiratory tract (URT) microbiota over the first two years of life and its relation to clinical outcomes. The study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee (12/LO/1362); parents gave written informed consent.
2.1.1. Setting
Participants were recruited at St Mary's Hospital, Imperial College NHS Trust, London (a public university hospital). Pregnant women were approached in the antenatal clinics for consideration of participation of their infant in the study from December 2012 to August 2013. Healthy babies born ≥37 weeks gestation whose parents had sufficient spoken English to maintain follow-up were included.
2.1.2. Recruitment
All healthy term (≥37 completed weeks of gestation) babies born at St Mary's Hospital between January 2013 and October 2013 inclusive, and whose parents/guardians had given consent, were eligible for the study. Of 297 families who had initially assented to the study, 222 subsequently provided a written informed consent; 14 were not eligible, 44 had decided against participating and 17 were lost to follow up.
2.1.3. Data and sample collection
An initial birth interview was undertaken using a researcher-administered custom questionnaire which included details of demographics, pregnancy and initial feeding. Additionally, maternal and neonatal notes, prescription charts and, where used, anaesthetic charts were reviewed for antibiotic use and labour and delivery details. We visited all participants at 6 weeks, 6, 9, 12, 18 and 24 months of age. At home visits, the infant's posterior oropharyngeal wall was swabbed with a double-headed nylon flocked swab (Copan diagnostics) (using a tongue depressor to avoid contamination from surrounding structures) by the research fellow or research nurse, who was trained in the technique. Oropharyngeal swabs were returned to the laboratory at room temperature and frozen at -80 °C within 10 h of collection. An interviewer-administered custom questionnaire was conducted at each home visit. The interviewer was unaware of any microbiota findings at the time of home visits and medical notes review.
2.2. Data sources and definition of outcomes
After the 2 years visit, medical notes were requested from the general practitioner (GP). The completeness of the data obtained was reviewed and where necessary the GP was contacted for further information or the previous GP was contacted. We transcribed primary care health care records, which include diagnoses, prescription of medications (including antibiotics), records of Emergency Room or out-of-hours visits, inpatient discharge letters and outpatient appointment letters. If these were incomplete and not available from the GP, where possible these documents were obtained from the source hospital. GP notes were reviewed for all consultation details; antibiotic and other medication use, immunisations and wheeze diagnoses were recorded.
Doctor-diagnosed wheeze was defined from the medical records as a recorded diagnosis of wheeze, auscultation-confirmed wheeze, or documentation by the physician of a history consistent with wheeze and a prescription of bronchodilator.
Recurrent wheeze was defined as more than one episode of doctor-diagnosed wheeze.
Antibiotic usage was ascertained both according to parental report and prescription data in the 4 weeks prior to the visit.
2.3. Assessment of microbiome
2.3.1. Bacterial DNA extraction and sequencing
DNA was extracted within 10 days of collection using the FastDNA Spin kit for soil (MPBiomedicals). The final elution step was into Tris (10 mM) low- ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (0∙1 mM) buffer; otherwise all steps were according to the manufacturer's protocol. An amplicon library was created by polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-amplifying the V3-V5 region of the 16S rRNA gene using a primer pair tagged with individually unique 12 base pair error correcting Golay barcodes [14]. PCR was performed in quadruplicate as described previously [14] with 2 changes: an increased volume of template solution was used (2 μl, total reaction volume still 25 μl), and the reaction was cycled 35 times. Amplicons were pooled, purified, size selected, and then pooled to an equimolar concentration and submitted for 454 pyrosequencing using the GS-FLX-Titanium (Roche) with the Roche Amplicon Lib-L protocol. Negative and positive controls (samples repeated across runs) were included to assess contamination and inter-run variability.
The amplicons were quality filtered and denoised using denoise_wrapper.py (denoising software for multiple 454 runs) within Quantitative Insights Into Microbial Ecology (QIIME) pipeline version 1∙9 [15]. Chimeras were removed using the usearch61 algorithm in QIIME. Sequences were clustered to 97% similarity using uclust, using the SILVA rRNA database (SSU_REF119) as reference [16]. Singletons and amplicons present in only a single sample were removed. Sequencing data is available at the European Nucleotide Archive: PRJEB6349.
2.3.2. qPCR method
Quantification of bacterial 16S rRNA-encoding genes was performed by real-time PCR with TaqMan hydrolysis probes on a StepOne™ Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems). The primers used, targeting the V3 and V4 regions of the 16S rRNA-encoding gene, were 5′ ACTCCTACGGGAGGCAG 3′ (forward) and 5′ GACTACCAGGGTATCTAATCC 3′ (reverse), and the probe used was 5′-(FAM)-TGCCAGCAGCCGCGGTAATAC-(BHQ-1)-3′ (where FAM is 6-carboxyfluorescein and BHQ1 is Black Hole Quencher 1 [17]. After an initial denaturation for 10 min at 95 °C, 40 cycles of amplification for 15 s at 95 °C, and 60 s at 60 °C were performed. Final cooling was performed at 4 °C.
Quantification of 16S rRNA-encoding genes was achieved by comparison with standard curves for known 16S rRNA concentrations. These were created by cloning amplified Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1 16S rRNA gene into TOPO TA Cloning vector. Qiagen plasmid extraction kit was used to obtain plasmid DNA, gel purified, and quantified using picogreen. Plasmid DNA was diluted to a working concentration of 1E+09 molecules/μl. Dilutions ranging from 1E+04 to 1E+08 molecules/μl were used on each qPCR plate to create standard curves.
2.3.3. Data analysis
Bacterial density was compared using the Friedmann test with a post-hoc Nemenyi test to assess differences between time points. To mitigate large differences in library sizes, rarefaction was used prior to alpha diversity analysis and the cumulative sum scaling (CSS) normalization was applied to OTU raw counts for all other analysis [18]. The variability within bacterial communities (alpha diversity) was assessed with the Shannon and Simpson indices obtained using phyloseq R package [19] and, consequently, were compared using Friedmann test with post-hoc Nemenyi tests. The differences among bacterial communities (beta diversity) were assessed by Bray-Curtis distance and plotted using principal coordinates analyses (PCoA). The effect of time and disease state was tested using the adonis procedures implemented in the vegan R package [20].
To ascertain the association between microbiota and clinical outcomes, we used a recently developed method for longitudinal marker-gene surveys based on smoothing splines [21], which uses longitudinal profiling of the microbiota communities to explore the complex relationships between community dynamics and phenotypes of interest. Specifically, this method detects time intervals for which bacteria are differentially abundant. Given observations at multiple time points, the difference in abundance across time is modelled as a function. Then, using group membership permutations, a null distribution of areas under the difference curve is estimated and used to detect time intervals of differential abundance [22]. In the longitudinal differential abundance analysis, to guarantee detection of relevant differences, we considered time intervals to be of potential significance if the absolute difference between two groups was above 0∙2 [21]. All models were adjusted for ethnicity, family history of atopy (fixed), presence of fever and the use of antibiotics in the 4 weeks prior to visit (time-varying) (for further details refer to the online supplement). To filter out noise, Operational Taxonomic Units (OTUs) (cluster of reads with ≥97% similarity of the 16S rRNA gene) found to be present less than three times in at least 20% of samples over time were removed from the analysis [22]. Analyses were implemented using the R package metagenomeSeq [23] using the fitTimeseries function.
3. Results
3.1. Characteristics of the study population
Participant flow is shown in Fig. 1; 768 prospective parents were approached, of whom 297 (39%) assented for their baby to participate once born. Children were born between January and October 2013; 204/297 (69%) parents consented to follow-up and completed at least one home visit, and 159/204 (78%) completed the 24-months visit. Children for whom sequencing and outcome data were not available for all time points were excluded (n = 61). There were no significant differences in demographic characteristics and outcomes between children included and excluded from this analysis, except for ethnicity (Table 1).
Table 1.
Characteristics | Complete data (N = 98) | Incomplete data (N = 106)a | p-Value | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Gender | Male | 48 (49%) | 49 (46%) | 0∙779 |
Ethnicity | Asian British | 6 (6%) | 14 (13%) | 0∙011 |
Black British | 4 (4%) | 16 (15%) | ||
Mixed | 25 (26%) | 16 (15%) | ||
Other | 10 (10%) | 13 (12%) | ||
White | 53 (54%) | 47 (44%) | ||
Season of birth | Spring | 32 (33%) | 38 (36%) | 0∙502 |
Summer | 34 (35%) | 38 (36%) | ||
Autumn | 4 (4%) | 8 (8%) | ||
Winter | 28 (29%) | 22 (21%) | ||
Gestation (days) | 282∙5[273∙2; 289∙0] | 283∙0 [277∙0; 288∙0] | 0∙849 | |
Birth weight (gr.) | 3500 [3130; 3810] | 3535 [3140; 3805] | 0∙739 | |
Family history atopy | Yes | 27 (28%) | 22 (21%) | 0∙325 |
Mode of delivery | Vaginal birth | 67 (68%) | 82 (77%) | 0∙159 |
Neonatal antibiotics | Yes | 9 (9%) | 8 (8%) | 0∙801 |
Intrapartum antibiotics | Yes | 14 (14%) | 11 (11%) | 0∙404 |
Smoking at home | Yes | 27 (28%) | 25 (24%) | 0∙525 |
Furry pet at home | Yes | 12 (12%) | 15 (14%) | 0∙837 |
Respiratory symptoms a week either side of visit | 6 weeks | 18 (19%) | 20 (19%) | 1∙000 |
6 months | 33 (34%) | 26 (31%) | 0∙752 | |
9 months | 41 (42%) | 27 (34%) | 0∙282 | |
12 months | 36 (37%) | 23 (32%) | 0∙625 | |
18 months | 52 (53%) | 29 (43%) | 0∙200 | |
24 months | 32 (33%) | 21 (34%) | 0∙863 | |
Wheeze a week either side of visit | 6 weeks | 0 (0%) | 1 (1%) | 1∙000 |
6 months | 3 (3%) | 0 (0%) | 0∙253 | |
9 months | 3 (3%) | 0 (0%) | 0.253 | |
12 months | 1 (1%) | 0 (0%) | 1∙000 | |
18 months | 1 (1%) | 0 (0%) | 1∙000 | |
24 months | 1 (1%) | 0 (0%) | 1∙000 | |
Fever a week either side of visit | 6 weeks | 4 (4%) | 2 (2%) | 0∙430 |
6 months | 11 (11%) | 9 (11%) | 1∙000 | |
9 months | 15 (15%) | 5 (6%) | 0∙093 | |
12 months | 10 (10%) | 7 (10%) | 1∙000 | |
18 months | 9 (9%) | 8 (12%) | 0∙608 | |
24 months | 13 (13%) | 6 (10%) | 0∙620 | |
Antibiotics in the 4 weeks prior to visit | 6 weeks | 8 (8%) | 3 (3%) | 0∙123 |
6 months | 3 (3%) | 4 (5%) | 0∙705 | |
9 months | 11 (11%) | 6 (8%) | 0∙452 | |
12 months | 11 (11%) | 4 (6%) | 0∙277 | |
18 months | 8 (8%) | 4 (6%) | 0∙763 | |
24 months | 7 (7%) | 4 (7%) | 1∙000 |
Sample size changes according to visit attendance. The reference denominator is N = 106, which is referred to the participants who entered the study by attending visit at 6 weeks. For the time-varying characteristics, denominators are N6w = 106, N6m = 84, N9 = 80, N12 = 71, N18 = 67, N24 = 61. Wheeze a week either side of visit is by parental report in this table only (due to the incomplete data with some participants missing GP notes).
Of 98 children with complete data, 25 were not prescribed antibiotics by age 2 years, 48 received 1–2 courses, 21 had 3–4 courses, and 4 were prescribed ≥5 courses. Doctor-diagnosed wheeze was confirmed in 26 children (median age of onset [interquartile range] 299 days [230–567]), of whom 11 had recurrent wheezing. Table 2 shows demographic characteristics and environmental exposures among children with and without doctor-diagnosed wheeze. Wheeze was significantly more common among children with a family history of atopy, those who had fever in the 4 weeks prior to the 9-month visit, and those who received antibiotics in the 4 weeks prior to the 12-month visit (Table 3).
Table 2.
Characteristics | Wheeze (Nw = 26) | Non-wheeze (Nnw = 72) | p-Value | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Gender | Male | 16 (62%) | 32 (44%) | 0∙172 |
Ethnicity | Asian British | 1 (4%) | 5 (7%) | 0∙935 |
Black British | 1 (4%) | 3 (4%) | ||
Mixed | 8 (31%) | 17 (24%) | ||
Other | 2 (8%) | 8 (11%) | ||
White | 14 (54%) | 39 (54%) | ||
Season of birth | Spring | 9 (35%) | 23 (32%) | 0∙404 |
Summer | 7 (27%) | 27 (38%) | ||
Autumn | 0 (0%) | 4 (6%) | ||
Winter | 10 (38%) | 18 (25%) | ||
Gestation (days) | 278∙5 [272;289∙0] | 283∙5 [274∙0;290∙0] | 0∙346 | |
Birth weight (gr.) | 3520 [3152;3718] | 3460 [3135;3815] | 0∙812 | |
Number of months breastfed | 6∙5 [2∙0; 9∙5] | 6∙0 [3∙0; 10∙7] | 0∙938 | |
Family history atopy | Yes | 12 (46%) | 15 (21%) | 0∙020 |
Mode of delivery | Vaginal birth | 17 (65%) | 50 (69%) | 0∙806 |
Neonatal antibiotics | Yes | 0 (0%) | 9 (13%) | 0∙107 |
Intrapartum antibiotics | Yes | 1 (4%) | 13 (18%) | 0∙104 |
Smoking at home | Yes | 7 (27%) | 20 (28%) | 1∙000 |
Furry pet at home | Yes | 2 (8%) | 10 (14%) | 0∙507 |
Respiratory symptoms a week either side of visit | 6 weeks | 6 (23%) | 12 (17%) | 0∙558 |
6 months | 11 (42%) | 22 (31%) | 0∙335 | |
9 months | 14 (54%) | 27 (38%) | 0∙169 | |
12 months | 11 (42%) | 25 (35%) | 0∙489 | |
18 months | 11 (42%) | 41 (57%) | 0∙253 | |
24 months | 9 (35%) | 23 (32%) | 0∙811 | |
Fever a week either side of visit | 6 weeks | 1 (4%) | 3 (4%) | 1∙000 |
6 months | 4 (15%) | 7 (10%) | 0∙475 | |
9 months | 8 (31%) | 7 (10%) | 0∙022 | |
12 months | 2 (8%) | 8 (11%) | 1∙000 | |
18 months | 1 (4%) | 8 (11%) | 0∙438 | |
24 months | 4 (15%) | 9 (13%) | 0∙740 |
Square brackets indicate interquartile range around the median. Fisher's Exact and Mann-Whitney test where appropriate. Bold indicates p value < 0.05.
Table 3.
Antibiotic variablea | Visit | Wheezers N = 26 | Non-wheezers N = 72 | p-values |
---|---|---|---|---|
Antibiotics in the 4 weeks prior to visit | 6 weeks | 1 (4%) | 7 (10%) | 0∙677 |
6 months | 1 (4%) | 2 (3%) | 1∙000 | |
9 months | 5 (19%) | 6 (8%) | 0∙154 | |
12 months | 8 (31%) | 3 (4%) | 0∙001 | |
18 months | 1 (4%) | 7 (10%) | 0∙677 | |
24 months | 1 (4%) | 6 (8%) | 0∙671 | |
Combined antibiotics within a month medical and parental report | 6 weeks | 1 (4%) | 7 (10%) | 0∙677 |
6 months | 1 (4%) | 2 (3%) | 1∙000 | |
9 months | 7 (27%) | 6 (8%) | 0∙037 | |
12 months | 8 (31%) | 3 (4%) | 0∙001 | |
18 months | 1 (4%) | 7 (10%) | 0∙677 | |
24 months | 3 (12%) | 6 (8%) | 0∙696 | |
Antibiotics prescription within month of visit | 6 weeks | 1 (4%) | 7 (10%) | 0∙677 |
6 months | 1 (4%) | 1 (1%) | 1∙000 | |
9 months | 7 (27%) | 3 (4%) | 0∙003 | |
12 months | 7 (27%) | 1 (1%) | <0∙001 | |
18 months | 1 (4%) | 3 (4%) | 1∙000 | |
24 months | 2 (8%) | 4 (6%) | 0∙654 |
The combined variable represents the antibiotic usage according to both parental report and prescription data. Fisher's Exact was used to assess differences in proportions. Bold indicates p value < 0.05.
There are three different variables for antibiotic use each with its own merits. The variable antibiotics in the 4 weeks prior to visit is according to parental report. This variable will thus not include situations where the GP has prescribed antibiotics but these are not subsequently given. For example, the case of a delayed script for an upper respiratory tract infection in case of persistence of symptoms. It will include antibiotics given by other providers for example dentists, or out of hour services which may not have been included in the GP notes or antibiotics given abroad. The antibiotics prescription within a month of visit was derived from prescriptions within the GP notes. The combined antibiotics within a month includes both the courses reported by the parent and those from the GP notes and is the most comprehensive account of antibiotic use.
3.2. Bacterial diversity and density
We obtained 1,559,882 sequencing reads from 588 swabs from 98 children, with a mean number of 2653 reads per sample. Fig. 2 shows the bacterial density by time point, represented by the quantity of 16S DNA recovered by qPCR. The bacterial density increased significantly in the first 9 months (p < 0∙001), and then remained unchanged thereafter.
Taxonomy of the 40 filtered OTUs (present more than three times in at least 20% of samples over time) is shown in Table E1. Fig. 3 shows their relative abundance at each time point. We observed a change in the composition of the oropharyngeal microbiota over the first 2 years of life (Fig. 3). The oropharyngeal microbiota was consistently characterized by high prevalence of the genus Streptococcus. Both alpha diversity measures show an increasing trend over 2 years (Fig. 4). Significant differences in alpha diversity were found throughout the entire period and were particularly striking when comparing 6-weeks samples with all others (Table E2). Considering Bray–Curtis dissimilarities, PCoA analysis (Fig. 5A&B) shows a difference in the beta diversity between 6 weeks and the other time point samples, highlighting the progression of the microbiota composition during the first 2 years of life (PERMANOVA analysis; p-value < 0∙001).
3.3. Oropharyngeal microbiota in children with and without doctor-confirmed wheeze
Fig. 6 shows the relative abundances of the 40 filtered OTUs among children with and without doctor-confirmed wheeze. There was a similar progression over 24 months in terms of the OTUs present, although we noted an increase in the level of Neisseria at age 18 months among children who wheezed. Considering Bray–Curtis dissimilarities, no differences in microbiota composition were found between wheezers and non-wheezers (PERMANOVA analysis, p = 0∙690, Fig. 5C&D).
Results of the longitudinal differential abundance analysis are presented in Table 4. After adjusting for possible confounders (ethnicity, family history of atopy, presence of fever and the use of antibiotics in the 4 weeks prior to visit) and after Bonferroni correction for multiple testing, three OTUs from the genera Neisseria, Prevotella and Granulicatella were found to be differentially abundant between children with and without doctor-diagnosed wheeze. There was a significant and substantial increase in the abundance of a Neisseria OTU over time in children with wheeze (p = 0∙003), while in those without we observed a significant increment in the abundance of a Granulicatella OTU (p = 0∙012) and of a Prevotella OTU (p = 0∙018). These three OTUs were equally abundant among wheezers and non-wheezers at 6 weeks of age; the Neisseria OTU became differentially abundant over the period between 9 and 24 months, with an increasing trend throughout the entire period, while the estimated difference function for the Granulicatella OTU showed that this genus was differentially abundant between 9 and 12 months, and the Prevotella OTU became differentially abundant after the 18th month (Fig. 7). Significant changes in both Neisseria and Granulicatella OTUs were detected in the period preceding the median age of onset of wheeze (299 days).
Table 4.
Differential abundance analysis: Children with doctor-confirmed wheeze (n = 26) vs. no wheeze (n = 72) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Genus | Interval start | Interval end | Differential area | p-value | Adjusted p-value |
OTU42: Granulicatella | 9 months | 12 months | (−) 1∙118 | 0∙004 | 0∙012 |
OTU43: Prevotella | 18 months | 24 months | (−) 1∙147 | 0∙006 | 0∙018 |
OTU68: Neisseria | 9 months | 24 months | (+) 5∙993 | 0∙001 | 0∙003 |
Time intervals are considered of interest if the absolute difference between two groups is above 0∙2. The sign of the difference area provides information on the direction of the abundance shift. OTUs are considered differentially abundant if their adjusted p-values < 0∙05.
To evaluate the robustness of the results with respect to the outcome definition, we perfomed a sensitivity analysis comparing longitudinal profiles of microbiota of children with recurrent wheezing (two or more occurrences of doctor diagnosed wheeze) and those who had never wheezed. After Bonferroni correction, three OTUs had significantly lower abundance among recurrent wheezers: a Granulicatella OTU and two Prevotella OTUs (Table 5). The shift in the Granulicatella OTU abundance appeared to last a longer period than for the wheeze group as a whole, being detected from 9 months and lasting until 24 months. The OTUs of the Prevotella genus were detected at a later time-point; OTU76 was differentially abundant from 12 to 24 months, and OTU43 from 12 months to 24 months. While changes in the Granulicatella OTU were significant shortly before the median age of onset of wheeze, the other two OTUs became differentially abundant after the median age of onset (Fig. E1).
Table 5.
Differential abundance analysis: Children with recurrent wheeze (n = 11) versus no wheeze (n = 72). | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Genus | Interval start | Interval end | Differential area | p-value | Adjusted p-value |
OTU42: Granulicatella | 9 months | 24 months | (−)4∙999 | 0∙001 | 0∙004 |
OTU43: Prevotella | 18 months | 24 months | (−)2∙637 | 0∙007 | 0∙028 |
OTU68: Neisseria | 12 months | 24 months | (+)3∙581 | 0∙015 | 0∙060 |
OTU76: Prevotella | 12 months | 24 months | (−)2∙090 | 0∙005 | 0∙020 |
Time intervals are considered of interest if the absolute difference between two groups is above 0∙2. The sign of the difference area provides information on the direction of the abundance shift. OTUs are considered differentially abundant if their adjusted p-values < 0∙05. Bold indicates p value < 0.05.
4. Discussion
Our data suggest that there is a time window which opens before age one year in which colonization of the oropharynx with Neisseria is positively, and with Granulicatella species negatively, associated with doctor-diagnosed wheezing by age two years. Although we cannot infer causality, we note that some of the identified shifts in OTUs occurred prior to the development of wheeze, whilst other shifts occurred following this event.
To the best of our knowledge, our study is the first detailed longitudinal evaluation of the oropharyngeal microbiota during early life in an unselected sample of healthy infants from the community, and its relationship with wheeze. These results suggest that changes in the oropharyngeal microbiota development may modulate wheeze development and might inform the design of preventive treatments.
There are limitations to our study. Through our filtering procedure, some potentially important OTUs may have been excluded. However, the filtering process was necessary to moderate the effect of measurement errors and noise. Another limitation arises from the relatively small sample size, thus the study may have been underpowered to detect all associations of the oropharyngeal microbiota with wheeze. We acknowledge that some of the negative findings may be secondary to low statistical power of the study. In addition, for our analysis we required sequencing data for every timepoint with the outcome data, and 98/159 (62%) of the participants completing the study had this available, and 159/220 (72%) of those whom initially consented completed the study. There is thus a possibility of selection bias as a result of this loss to follow up. Whilst there were minimal differences between baseline characteristics of those included in the analysis compared to those either without sufficient data or who did not complete follow up, sample sizes were small and there may not have been sufficient statistical power to detect differences. Further external validations are needed to ascertain generalizability of our findings.
There are other potential confounders which we have not accounted for, including viral infection. There are known interactions between the upper respiratory tract microbiota and respiratory viruses [24], (including early RSV infection which is also associated with later wheeze) which may have confounded our analysis. Whilst reviewing GP records we made note of any hospital admissions and among the 98 participants studied, two had been admitted with bronchiolitis.
Using microbial marker genes such as the 16S rRNA gene have their limitations particularly when attempting to discriminate between species [25]. We cannot comment further on the role of individual species, and this is particularly an issue within the Streptococcus genus, limiting the comparison of our findings to previous culture-based studies [8].
We endeavoured to visit children when they were well, but 36.5% had symptoms of a mild respiratory illness, 3.8% had wheezed and 10.6% had fever within the week preceding or following the visit. We adjusted analyses for the presence of recent fever. We have included a health professional's interpretation of report of wheeze with a prescription of bronchodilator for wheeze – this may have led to an over-diagnosis of wheeze compared to solely including where the notes included auscultation of wheeze. However, some of the medical notes were brief and did not include details of auscultation thus we may have missed cases if we had not used this definition.
Lastly, we present wheeze data to age two years, after which wheezing patterns continue to develop [26]. Therefore, further follow-up will be necessary to draw more definitive conclusions. Assessment of allergic sensitization and lung function, which we did not conduct, would be useful at follow-up.
Our study has several strengths; we have used a community-based unselected cohort, which increases its relevance to the general population. We have meticulously collected clinical data from primary care records, so that our definition of wheeze is not reliant on parental report which has its limitations [27], but was determined by a health professional. We collected detailed data on potential confounders. We endeavoured to comprehensively explore antibiotic use, which is widespread in young children and may introduce potentially major bias, at least temporarily perturbing the microbial community structure [28], and have adjusted our analyses for the recent use of antibiotics.
We have used a non-culture method to identify the majority of the microbiota, avoiding the bias introduced by culture. In recognition of the importance of the development of the microbiota over time, we have used a recently developed method of analysis to take a longitudinal view of the data.
In our study, the respiratory microbiota through the first two years of life was dominated by Streptococci, which is consistent with previous studies [29,30]. We observed an increase in diversity of the oropharyngeal microbiota with increasing age, with a changing pattern of OTUs, and a fairly smooth temporal change over time. In contrast to the nasopharyngeal microbiota [31], the oropharyngeal microbiota appears less varied and is dominated by a single genus. This topography of the microbiota may affect the relationship between the microbiota at different niches and preschool wheezing.
An association between wheeze, asthma and the resident microbiota has been suggested by epidemiological studies showing a reduction in the incidence of these conditions in children who are exposed to a richer environmental microbiota through growing up on a farm, and/or by their mothers working in stables when pregnant [32]. These studies were followed by an increasing body of evidence for an association between the composition of the early respiratory tract microbiota and subsequent respiratory health, including its relation to wheeze [9,11], asthma [10], bronchiolitis [33], pneumonia [33], and upper respiratory tract infections [31,34]. Using longitudinal analyses, we questioned whether a change over time in specific species were associated with doctor-diagnosed wheeze. We have found a positive temporal association between the presence of a Neisseria OTU and doctor-diagnosed wheeze, and this difference was observed from age 9 months. Although we cannot ascertain the causal relation of changes in the microbiota and wheeze development, we have shown that the differential abundance of the OTUs started in the period preceding the median age of onset. Conversely, a Granulicatella OTU was negatively associated with wheeze. We have found a negative association between recurrent wheeze and two Prevotella OTUs and a Granulicatella OTU, albeit with small numbers of recurrent wheezers.
Similar features with higher prevalence of Neisseria in wheezing infants compared to non-wheezers have previously been demonstrated in a cross-sectional study in 10-month old infants in Ecuador [35]. However, there were also differences to our study, with Prevotella being associated with wheeze in this case-control study. Veillonella was observed more frequently in controls. Other cross-sectional studies have associated the phylum Proteobacteria with airway disease [5], and have shown a difference in the nasal microbiota in terms of both alpha and beta diversity and the abundance of a Moraxella OTU [12]. School-age asthmatic children had a higher abundance of Moraxella, but only if they had not grown up on a farm, whereas in farm children the same Moraxella OTU was not associated with asthma, suggesting the farm environment had a modifying effect [12]. In this study, the authors found an association at school age between the nasal microbiota and asthma but no such association between the microbiota of the throat and asthma. It may be that association between the microbiota and clinical phenotype are different prior to disease onset than in already established disease, and there may be different associations with disease, with the microbiota of the young infant where the microbiota is still developing and that of the established microbiota. The site of swabbing and therefore the niche sampled in the study by Depner et al, was also different to our study – they swabbed the soft palate and tonsils, whereas we took swabs from the oropharynx.
Granulicatella is a well-recognised commensal of the upper respiratory tract. Its presence in the microbiota has been negatively associated with the presence of Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae and Moraxella catarrhalis, an association modulated by antibiotic use [28]. In the same study, Granulicatella, Rothia, Gemella, Actinomyces and Veillonella were correlated taxa which as a group were less likely to be associated with S. pneumoniae carriage. Our finding of a negative association of Granulicatella with wheeze may reflect underlying beneficial polymicrobial interactions which are protective against the development of wheeze. Interestingly, a recent family-based cross-sectional study found a higher abundance of Granulicatella in the sputum of the non-asthmatic sibling compared to their asthmatic sibling [36]. Rosas-Salazar et al. [37], followed a cohort of infants who had had RSV infection and monitored for subsequent development of wheeze. They found an increase in detection and abundance of Lactobacillus in the nasopharynx at the time of RSV infection in those who did not develop wheeze compared to those who did. Whilst their cohort had different characteristics (all had had RSV infection, the definition of wheeze was reliant on parental report alone, and the analysis was at one timepoint point only), the results lead to a similar hypothesis of a potential benefit of commensal bacteria protecting against wheeze development.
We did not find the association between early Streptococcus and wheeze seen by others, which may be due to methodological differences; Bisgaard et al. [8], used a culture method to detect S. pneumoniae, and Teo et al. [9], dichotomised the Streptococcus load in early nasopharynx samples analysed using next generation sequencing. In addition to variation by anatomical region sampled, results from next generation sequencing studies can also vary by sequencing platform used (e.g. Illumina used by Teo et al. [9], versus Roche 454 platform which we used), and the region of 16S rRNA sequenced (V4 versus V3-V5 respectively).
We observed changes in the microbiota occurring later in infancy than we had anticipated based on previous evidence. It is unclear whether the changes in microbiota described in our study are a result of a disordered or conversely beneficial ecosystem, and whether the microbiota have had a role in the airway and immune system development resulting in or protecting from wheeze.
In conclusion, we identified a window in the development of the oropharyngeal microbiota between 9 and 24 months of age where, for most of the OTUs, shifts in abundance occurred. The abundance of OTUs from the genera Neisseria and Granulicatella was different according to whether the infant was diagnosed with wheeze. Future work will test whether this relationship holds for asthma at school age.
Acknowledgments
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank the DORMICe research team including research nurses who worked on the project, and most importantly the families who took part in the study.
Funding sources
Research funding from the Winnicott Foundation, Meningitis Now and an unrestricted research grant from Micropathology Ltd. Meningitis Now and the Winnicott Foundation had no role in the study design, analysis, interpretation or report writing. CF co-founder of Micropathology Ltd. is an academic supervisor of EP, and was involved in study design and report editing.
Declarations of Competing Interest
Dr. Custovic reports personal fees from Novartis, personal fees from Regeneron/Sanofi, personal fees from Thermo Fisher Scientific, personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, personal fees from Novartis, personal fees from Philips, outside the submitted work. Dr. Belgrave reports personal fees from GSK, outside the submitted work.
Author contributions
JSK, EP, AS and CF contributed to the concept and design of the study. EP, EC, RF and AS contributed to the performance and analysis of preparation of samples and library for sequencing. EB, RF, EC and AS contributed to the performance and analysis of the qPCR data. SF and DB performed statistical analysis. All authors contributed to drafting the manuscript. The corresponding author had full access to all the data in the study and had final responsibility for the decision to submit for publication.
Footnotes
Supplementary data to this article can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ebiom.2019.07.034.
Appendix A. Supplementary data
References
- 1.Bosch A.A., Levin E., van Houten M.A. Development of upper respiratory tract microbiota in infancy is affected by mode of delivery. EBioMedicine. 2016;9:336–345. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2016.05.031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Koenig J.E., Spor A., Scalfone N. Succession of microbial consortia in the developing infant gut microbiome. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108(Suppl. 1):4578–4585. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1000081107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Abrahamsson T.R., Jakobsson H.E., Andersson A.F., Bjorksten B., Engstrand L., Jenmalm M.C. Low gut microbiota diversity in early infancy precedes asthma at school age. Clin Exp Allergy. 2014;44(6):842–850. doi: 10.1111/cea.12253. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Russell S.L., Gold M.J., Hartmann M. Early life antibiotic-driven changes in microbiota enhance susceptibility to allergic asthma. EMBO Rep. 2012;13(5):440–447. doi: 10.1038/embor.2012.32. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Hilty M., Burke C., Pedro H. Disordered microbial communities in asthmatic airways. PLoS One. 2010;5(1) doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0008578. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Whiteson K.L., Bailey B., Bergkessel M. The upper respiratory tract as a microbial source for pulmonary infections in cystic fibrosis. Parallels from island biogeography. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2014;189(11):1309–1315. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201312-2129PP. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Dickson R.P., Erb-Downward J.R., Martinez F.J., Huffnagle G.B. The microbiome and the respiratory tract. Annu Rev Physiol. 2016;78:481–504. doi: 10.1146/annurev-physiol-021115-105238. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Bisgaard H., Hermansen M.N., Buchvald F. Childhood asthma after bacterial colonization of the airway in neonates. New Engl J of Med. 2007;357(15):1487–1495. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa052632. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Teo S.M., Mok D., Pham K. The infant nasopharyngeal microbiome impacts severity of lower respiratory infection and risk of asthma development. Cell Host Microbe. 2015;17(5):704–715. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2015.03.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Dzidic M., Abrahamsson T., Artacho A., Collado M.C., Mira A., Jenmalm M.C. Oral microbiota maturation during the first 7 years of life in relation to allergy development. Allergy. 2018;73(10):2000–2011. doi: 10.1111/all.13449. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Ta L.D.H., Yap G.C., Tay C.J.X. Establishment of the nasal microbiota in the first 18 months of life: correlation with early-onset rhinitis and wheezing. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2018;142(1):86–95. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2018.01.032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Depner M., Ege M.J., Cox M.J. Bacterial microbiota of the upper respiratory tract and childhood asthma. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2017;139(3):826–34 e13. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2016.05.050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Boutin S., Depner M., Stahl M. Comparison of Oropharyngeal microbiota from children with asthma and cystic fibrosis. Mediators Inflamm. 2017;2017 doi: 10.1155/2017/5047403. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Sim K., Cox M.J., Wopereis H. Improved detection of bifidobacteria with optimised 16S rRNA-gene based pyrosequencing. PLoS One. 2012;7(3) doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0032543. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Caporaso J.G., Kuczynski J., Stombaugh J. QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data. Nat Methods. 2010;7(5):335–336. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.f.303. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Pruesse E., Quast C., Knittel K. SILVA: a comprehensive online resource for quality checked and aligned ribosomal RNA sequence data compatible with ARB. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007;35(21):7188–7196. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkm864. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Yu Y., Lee C., Kim J., Hwang S. Group-specific primer and probe sets to detect methanogenic communities using quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2005;89(6):670–679. doi: 10.1002/bit.20347. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.McMurdie P.J., Holmes S. Waste not, want not: why rarefying microbiome data is inadmissible. PLoS Comput Biol. 2014;10(4) doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003531. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.McMurdie P.J., Holmes S. Phyloseq: an R package for reproducible interactive analysis and graphics of microbiome census data. PLoS One. 2013;8(4) doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0061217. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.FGB Jari Oksanen, Friendly Michael, Kindt Roeland, Legendre Pierre, PRM Dan McGlinn, O'Hara R.B. 2017. vegan: community ecology package. R package version 2.4-4. [Google Scholar]
- 21.Paulson J.N., Talukder H. Corrada Bravo H. longitudinal differential abundance analysis of microbial marker-gene surveys using smoothing splines. bioRxiv. 2017 099457. [Google Scholar]
- 22.Paulson J.N., Stine O.C., Bravo H.C., Pop M. Differential abundance analysis for microbial marker-gene surveys. Nat Methods. 2013;10(12):1200–1202. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2658. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Paulson JN, Talukder H, Pop M, Bravo HC. metagenomeSeq: statistical analysis for sparse high-throughput sequencing. Bioconductor package: 1.19.0.
- 24.de Steenhuijsen Piters W.A.A., Heinonen S., Hasrat R. Nasopharyngeal microbiota, host Transcriptome, and disease severity in children with respiratory syncytial virus infection. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2016;194(9):1104–1115. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201602-0220OC. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Case R.J., Boucher Y., Dahllof I., Holmstrom C., Doolittle W.F., Kjelleberg S. Use of 16S rRNA and rpoB genes as molecular markers for microbial ecology studies. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2007;73(1):278–288. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01177-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Deliu M., Belgrave D., Sperrin M., Buchan I., Custovic A. Asthma phenotypes in childhood. Expert Rev Clin Immunol. 2016:1–9. doi: 10.1080/1744666X.2017.1257940. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Lowe L., Murray C.S., Martin L. Reported versus confirmed wheeze and lung function in early life. Arch Dis Child. 2004;89(6):540–543. doi: 10.1136/adc.2003.038539. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Pettigrew M.M., Laufer A.S., Gent J.F., Kong Y., Fennie K.P., Metlay J.P. Upper respiratory tract microbial communities, acute otitis media pathogens, and antibiotic use in healthy and sick children. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2012;78(17):6262–6270. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01051-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Hu Q., Dai W., Zhou Q. Dynamic oropharyngeal and faecal microbiota during treatment in infants hospitalized for bronchiolitis compared with age-matched healthy subjects. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1) doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-11311-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Stearns J.C., Davidson C.J., McKeon S. Culture and molecular-based profiles show shifts in bacterial communities of the upper respiratory tract that occur with age. ISME J. 2015;9(5):1246–1259. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2014.250. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Bosch A., Piters W., van Houten M.A. Maturation of the infant respiratory microbiota, environmental drivers, and health consequences. A prospective cohort study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017;196(12):1582–1590. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201703-0554OC. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.von Mutius E., Vercelli D. Farm living: effects on childhood asthma and allergy. Nat Rev Immunol. 2010;10(12):861–868. doi: 10.1038/nri2871. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Vissing N.H., Chawes B.L., Bisgaard H. Increased risk of pneumonia and bronchiolitis after bacterial colonization of the airways as neonates. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2013;188(10):1246–1252. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201302-0215OC. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Biesbroek G., Tsivtsivadze E., Sanders E.A. Early respiratory microbiota composition determines bacterial succession patterns and respiratory health in children. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2014;190(11):1283–1292. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201407-1240OC. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Cardenas P.A., Cooper P.J., Cox M.J. Upper airways microbiota in antibiotic-naive wheezing and healthy infants from the tropics of rural Ecuador. PLoS One. 2012;7(10) doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0046803. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Wang L., de Angel Sola D., Mao Y. Family-based study reveals decreased abundance of sputum Granulicatella in asthmatics. Allergy. 2018;73(9):1918–1921. doi: 10.1111/all.13493. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Rosas-Salazar C., Shilts M.H., Tovchigrechko A. Nasopharyngeal Lactobacillus is associated with a reduced risk of childhood wheezing illnesses following acute respiratory syncytial virus infection in infancy. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2018;142(5):1447–1456. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2017.10.049. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.