Skip to main content
. 2015 May 12;38(7):413–421. doi: 10.1002/clc.22412

Table 1.

Comparisons of Clinical Characteristics Between NIPPVPAP and Non‐PAP Groups

PAP, n = 31 Non‐PAP, n = 78 P Value
Age, y 65.7 ± 11.7 68.5 ± 14.2 0.324
Male sex 23 (74.2) 46 (59.0) 0.137
NYHA functional class (I/II/III/IV) 0/20/11/0 0/47/28/3 0.533
Epworth Sleepiness Scale 7.1 ± 4.4 5.2 ± 3.7 0.085
BMI, kg/m2 26.0 ± 4.3 23.7 ± 3.9 0.010
Ischemic etiology 5 (16.1) 9 (11.5) 0.518
Hypertension 26 (83.9) 62 (79.5) 0.601
DM 10 (32.3) 27 (34.6) 0.815
Dyslipidemia 26 (83.9) 62 (79.5) 0.601
AF 12 (38.7) 36 (46.2) 0.480
CKD 15 (48.4) 49 (62.8) 0.167
Anemia 8 (25.8) 39 (50.0) 0.021
COPD 8 (25.8) 22 (28.2) 0.800
NIPPVPAP
CPAP/ASV 16/15 0/0
Medications
β‐Blocker 27 (87.1) 58 (74.4) 0.148
RAS inhibitor 29 (93.5) 63 (80.8) 0.097
Diuretic 10 (32.3) 42 (53.8) 0.042
Aldosterone antagonist 13 (41.9) 35 (44.9) 0.781
Statin 12 (38.7) 19 (24.4) 0.134

Abbreviations: AF, atrial fibrillation; ASV, adaptive servo ventilation; BMI, body mass index; CKD, chronic kidney disease; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; CPAP, continuous positive airway pressure; DM, diabetes mellitus; NYHA, New York Heart Association; PAP, positive airway pressure; RAS, renin‐angiotensin‐aldosterone; SD, standard deviation.

Data are presented as mean ± SD or n (%).