Skip to main content
Clinical Cardiology logoLink to Clinical Cardiology
letter
. 2015 Jul 27;38(7):446. doi: 10.1002/clc.22415

Authors' Reply

Syed Wamique Yusuf 1, Smita I Negi 1, Jose Banchs 1, Rahul G Argula 1,2
PMCID: PMC6711051  PMID: 26216008

To the Editor:

We thank Khalid and colleagues for their insightful letter, emphasizing the importance of total electrical alternans and vector alternans in the diagnosis of cardiac tamponade. Electrical alternans has diverse mechanisms and is present in various conditions ranging from coronary ischemia, atrioventricular tachycardia, to large pericardial effusion.1 Both electrical alternans and vector alternans, as mentioned by the authors, are highly specific findings, but its absence does not exclude cardiac tamponade.

In our study among patients with large pericardial effusion, the specificity of electrical alternans for detecting tamponade was 86%, whereas the sensitivity was only 24%.2 The positive predictive value of electrical alternans was 95% for the presence of tamponade, but its negative predictive value was only 9.5%.2

The finding of high specificity and low sensitivity of electrical alternans for cardiac tamponade has been reported by others as well.3, 4 Unfortunately, we did not classify our alternans patients to see how many had amplitude alternans vs vector alternans, or total alternans for that matter. Therefore, we do not know how many of our study patients had each type of alternans.

We only assessed electrocardiogram findings in the setting of echocardiographic evidence of tamponade; therefore, its comparison with other studies using clinical criteria for tamponade may not be applicable.

Syed Wamique Yusuf, MBBS, MRCPI
Smita I. Negi, MD
Jose Banchs, MD
Rahul G. Argula, MBBS, MPH
MD Anderson Cancer Center
Department of Cardiology
University of Texas
Houston, Texas
Rahul G. Argula, MD
Division of Pulmonary Critical Care, Allergy and Sleep Medicine
Medical University of South Carolina
Charleston, South Carolina

References

  • 1. Surawicz B. Fisch C. Cardiac alternans: diverse mechanisms and clinical manifestations. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1992;20:483–499. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Argula RG, Negi SI, Banchs J, et al. Role of a 12‐lead electrocardiogram in the diagnosis of cardiac tamponade as diagnosed by transthoracic echocardiography in patients with malignant pericardial effusion. Clin Cardiol. 2015;38:139–144. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Eisenberg MJ, Munoz de Romeral L, Heidenreich PA, et al. The diagnosis of pericardial effusion and cardiac tamponade by 12 lead ECG. A technology assessment. Chest. 1996;110:318–324. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Mathur AP, Saini A, Luca BP, et al. Diagnostic accuracy retrospectively of electrocardiographic findings and cancer history for tamponade in patients determined to have pericardial effusion by transthoracic echocardiogram. Am J Cardiol. 2013;111:1062–1066. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Clinical Cardiology are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES