Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Sep 7.
Published in final edited form as: Analyst. 2019 Aug 2;144(17):5108–5116. doi: 10.1039/c9an01093a

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Electrode surface area studies before and after electrode modifications using 0.5 mM Fc-MeOH in 0.1 M TEAP vs Ag/AgCl (0.14M NaCl); (A) Cyclic voltammograms at different scan rates (from 10 to 200 mV/s) for bare electrode; (B) peak current (Ip) vs. square root of the scan rate (ν1/2)for bare electrode; (C) Ip vs. ν1/2 for rGO coated electrode; (D) Ip vs. ν1/2 for AuNP electrode; (E) Ip vs. ν1/2 for chitosan electrode. (Error bars = standard deviation, n=8)