Skip to main content
. 2019 Aug 27;16(8):e1002887. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002887

Table 3. Weight and MUAC gain velocity of children with SAM randomised to reduced or standard RUTF dose in unadjusted model.

Outcome Reduced RUTF Standard RUTF Difference
(95% CI)
p-value
Admission to Discharge n mean ± SD n mean ± SD
Weight gain velocity (g/kg/day)
ITT 396 3.4 ± 3.1 389 3.4 ± 3.1 0.0 (−0.4 to 0.4) 0.92
PP1 200 4.3 ± 3.4 223 4.1 ± 3.6 0.2 (−0.5 to 0.8) 0.58
Recovered 212 4.9 ± 2.6 221 4.9 ± 2.5 −0.1 (−0.6 to 0.4) 0.73
Referred 74 0.9 ± 3.4 78 0.4 ± 3.0 0.5 (−0.6 to 1.5) 0.37
Defaulted 46 2.5 ± 1.9 26 2.7 ± 2.7 −0.3 (−1.3 to 0.8) 0.64
MUAC gain velocity (mm/week)
ITT 398 1.8 ± 1.8 390 1.9 ± 1.9 −0.1 (−0.3 to 0.2) 0.58
PP1 201 2.4 ± 2.1 224 2.4 ± 2.1 −0.1 (−0.5 to 0.3) 0.78
After Two Weeks
Weight gain velocity (g/kg/day)
ITT 376 2.3 ± 2.6 368 2.7 ± 2.9 −0.4 (−0.8 to −0.02) 0.041
PP1 188 2.7 ± 2.9 207 3.1 ± 3.4 −0.4 (−1.0 to 0.2) 0.22
MUAC gain velocity (mm/week)
ITT 378 1.1 ± 1.7 368 1.4 ± 1.9 −0.2 (−0.5 to −0.001) 0.051
PP1 189 1.6 ± 1.9 207 1.8 ± 2.2 −0.2 (−0.6 to 0.2) 0.27

Data are mean ± SD and mean difference (95% CI) when using linear mixed models, with study site and team as random effects.

1PP (per protocol) includes children that had no missed visits, that consumed >50% of daily dose throughout treatment, that were not falsely discharged, and that received the correct RUTF dose throughout treatment.

Abbreviations: ITT, intention to treat; MUAC, mid-upper arm circumference; PP, per protocol; RUTF, ready-to-use therapeutic food; SAM, severe acute malnutrition.