Skip to main content
. 2019 Aug 27;14(8):e0221680. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0221680

Table 2. The average water content, pH and TBARS values, cooking loss and total HAA contents of the samples (mean ± SD).

nx Water
(%)
pH TBARS
(mg MDA/kg)
Cooking Loss
(%)
Total HAA
(ng/g)
Usage rate (UR, %)
0 12 61,72 ± 3,95a 5,98 ± 0,14c 1,228 ± 0,425a 31,56 ± 4,74a 1,25 ± 1,22a
0,5 12 60,78 ± 4,84b 6,02 ± 0,14b 1,088 ± 0,283b 30,02 ± 4,98b 0,81 ± 0,79b
1 12 59,66 ± 5,33c 6,03 ± 0,12a 1,023 ± 0,234c 29,07 ± 4,51c 0,65 ± 0,62c
Sign. ** ** ** ** **
Cooking Process (CP)
Raw 18 64,95 ± 0,38a 5,89 ± 0,03b 0,876 ± 0,032b
Cooked 18 56,49 ± 2,67b 6,13 ± 0,06a 1,349 ± 0,316a
Sign ** ** **
Cooking Temperature (CT, °C)
150 12 62,25 ± 2,96a 5,97 ± 0,09c 0,959 ± 0,100c 24,38 ± 1,19c nd
200 12 60,13 ± 5,16b 6,02 ± 0,14b 1,102 ± 0,259b 31,65 ± 1,25b 0,58 ± 0,26b
250 12 59,80 ± 5,53c 6,04 ± 0,15a 1,277 ± 0,455a 34,62 ± 1,30a 2,03 ± 0,58a
Sign. ** ** ** ** **
Interactions
UR x CP ** ** **
UR x CT ns * ** ns **
CP x CT ** ** **
UR x CP x CT ns * **

** p<0,01,

*p<0,05,

ns: Not Significant (p>0,05),

xn = 6 for cooking loss values

SD: Standard Deviation, nd: Not detected,

Different letters (a-c) in the same column denote significant differences (p<0,05)