Table 1. Goodness-of-fit indices of the dimensional models tested.
| Models | χ2 | df | CFI | TLI | RMSEA (90% C.I.) | WRMR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| One-dimensional model | 2740.57 | 170 | .52 | .46 | .12 (.12-.13) | 3.30 |
| One-dimensional model with correlated term | 2318.55 | 162 | .68 | .62 | .11 (.11-.12) | 3.14 |
| Two-factor model orthogonal (Watson and Clarck) | 874.41 | 170 | .87 | .85 | .06 (.06-.07) | 1.99 |
| Two-factor model orthogonal, CE permitted (3) | 789.80 | 167 | .88 | .87 | .06 (.06-.07) | 1.89 |
| Two-factor model oblique solution | 812.08 | 169 | .88 | .87 | .06 (.06-.07) | 1.73 |
| Two-factor model oblique solution, CE permitted (3) | 684.43 | 166 | .89 | .89 | .05 (.05-.06) | 1.57 |
| Three-factor model oblique solution | 743.32 | 167 | .89 | .88 | .06 (.05-.06) | 1.64 |
| Three-factor model oblique solution, CE permitted (3) | 616.52 | 164 | .92 | .90 | .05 (.05-.06) | 1.48 |
| Three-factor model PA and NA uncorrelated | 844.74 | 169 | .87 | .86 | .06 (.06-.07) | 1.69 |
| Three factor model PA and NA uncorrelated, CE permitted (3) | 760.20 | 166 | .89 | .87 | .06 (.05-.07) | 1.86 |
| Bifactor model | 566.99 | 150 | .92 | .90 | .05 (.05-.06) | 1.33 |
| Bifactor model, CE permitted (3) | 479.69 | 147 | .94 | .92 | .05 (.04-.05) | 1.21 |
| ESEM two factor solution | 666.01 | 151 | .90 | .88 | .06 (.05-.06) | 1.33 |
| ESEM two factor solution, CE permitted (3) | 561.31 | 148 | .92 | .90 | .05(.05-.06) | 1.22 |
| ESEM three factor solution | 411.06 | 133 | .95 | .93 | .04 (.04-.05) | 0.99 |
| ESEM three factor solution, CE permitted (3) | 358.31 | 130 | .96 | .94 | .04(.04-.05) | 0.92 |
Note. χ2 = Chi square; df = degrees of freedom; CFI = Comparative Fit Index; TLI = Tucker-Lewis Index; RMSEA = Root Mean Square Error of Approximation; CI = Confidence Interval; WRMR = Weighted Root Mean Square Residual.