Skip to main content
. 2019 Apr-Jun;15(2):145–152. doi: 10.4183/aeb.2019.145

Table 2.

Correlations between mean changes in anthropometric measurements and mean changes in laboratory measurements, and multivariate linear regression analysis to identify the best correlation changes in HOMA-IR score

  Correlation Analysis Multivariate Linear Regression Analysis
Variables ΔFBG ΔInsulin ΔHOMA-IR ΔHOMA-IR*
  p r p r p r b (SE)* β* p*
ΔBW 0.010 0.254 0.020 0.230 <0.001 0.362 - - -
ΔBMI 0.007 0.264 0.012 0.247 <0.001 0.371 0.344 (0.145) 0.299 0.020
ΔTAT% 0.020 0.231 0.416 - 0.203 - -0.152 (0.103) -0.310 0.143
ΔVAT 0.001 0.316 0.005 0.275 0.001 0.324 0.308 (0.136) 0.435 0.026
ΔTBAT mass 0.067 - 0.226 - 0.092 - - - -
ΔTBAT% 0.240 - 0.545 - 0.936 - -0,103 (0.071) -0.166 0.148
ΔNC 0.265 - 0.230 - 0.202 - 0.020 (0.111) 0.066 0.523
ΔWC 0.033 0.212 0.421 - 0.211 - 0.071 (0.039) 0.062 0.606
ΔHC 0.015 0.240 0.398 - 0.122 - -0.026 (0.041) -0.073 0.532

“Δ”symbol at the front of a variable indicates the mean change in the variable after dieting. “-” sign indicates lack of correlation between variables (p>0.05). *Dependent variable is ΔHOMA-IR score. BW: body weight, BMI: body mass index, TAT: trunk adipose tissue, VAT: visceral adipose tissue, TBAT: total body adipose tissue, NC: neck circumference, WC: waist circumference, HC: hip circumference, FBG: fasting blood glucose, HOMA-IR: homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance.