Skip to main content
. 2019 Aug 23;12:699–710. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S214120

Table 3.

Students’ rural practice intention before and after placement by background

Background Likert response Rural practice intention, n (%)a p-Value*
Beforeb Afterc
Urban (n=127) Strongly Agree (5) 8 (6.3) 28 (22.0) <0.001
Agree (4) 44 (34.6) 61 (48.0)
Neutral (3) 29 (22.8) 27 (21.3)
Disagree (2) 37 (29.1) 8 (6.3)
Strongly Disagree (1) 9 (7.1) 3 (2.4)
Mean score (SD) 3.04 (1.087) 3.81 (0.932)
Rural (n=144) Strongly Agree (5) 55 (38.2) 52 (36.1) 0.063
Agree (4) 53 (36.8) 62 (43.1)
Neutral (3) 24 (16.7) 28 (19.4)
Disagree (2) 9 (6.3) 2 (1.4)
Strongly Disagree (1) 3 (2.1) 0 (0)
Mean score 4.03 (0.996) 4.14 (0.772)

Notes: aPercentages may not add up to 100 due to rounding. bBefore: “Prior to this placement I was considering living and working in a regional, rural, or remote location following graduation.” cAfter: “This placement has made me reconsider my future and I am now considering living and working in a regional, rural, or remote location following my graduation.” *Wilcoxon Signed Ranks Test.