Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Gait Posture. 2019 Jul 4;73:86–92. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2019.06.018

Table 2.

Mean, standard deviation and 95% Confidence interval for mean of the young and older adults’ gait parameters and measures of dynamic stability

Variables Young adults Older adults p-value
MOSfa at FSA (m) −0.14±0.04
[−0.17, −0.11]
−0.17±0.07
[−0.21, −0.13]
0.241a
MOSfa variability at FSA (m) 0.02±0.01
[0.12, 0.03]
0.03±0.01
[0.02, 0.03]
0.014*b
MOSml at FSA (m) 0.12±0.02
[0.11, 0.13]
0.13±0.03
[0.11, 0.14]
0.598b
MOSml variability at FSA (m) 0.01±0.01
[0.011, 0.017]
0.02±0.01
[0.017, 0.024]
0.007*a
Zero crossing fa (m) 1.45±0.11
[1.38, 1.53]
1.10±0.24
[0.96, 1.24]
<0.001 *a
Sensitivity of MOS −0.22±0.03
[−0.24, −0.20]
−0.23±0.07
[−0.27, −0.19]
0.666a
FSA (m/s) 2.00±0
[2.00, 2.00]
1.82±0.35
[1.56, 1.96]
0.021 *b

MOS = the Margin of Stability (fa = fore-aft direction and ml = medial-lateral direction), FSA = fast Speed Attempted, sec = second, and m/s = meter per second.

*

Statistically significant difference at p<0.05.

a

Comparison between groups by using the Independent t test.

b

Comparison between groups by using the Mann-Whitney U test.