Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Urology. 2019 May 25;131:176–183. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2019.05.012

Table 2.

Medicare Part D Public Use File – Urologist Use of Abiraterone and Enzalutamide by Practice Type

Abiraterone 2013 2014 2015
Total (n=98) Moderate (n=95) High (n=3) Total (n=289) Moderate (n=278) High (n=11) Total (n=312) Moderate (n=301) High (n=11)
Solo 15 15 0 42 42 0 50 50 0
Single-
specialty
72 70 2 198 188 10 208 198 10
Specialty 0 0 0 5 5 0 6 6 0
Multi-specialty 11 10 1 44 43 1 48 47 1
Enzalutamide 2013 2014 2015
Total (n=22) Moderate (n=21) High (n=1) Total (n=87) Moderate (n=82) High (n=5) Total (n=479) Moderate (n=463) High (n=16)
Solo 4 4 0 13 13 0 83 83 0
Single-
specialty
14 13 1 63 60 3 326 311 15
Specialty 0 0 0 1 1 0 4 4 0
Multi-specialty 4 4 0 10 8 2 66 65 1

Moderate prescribers prescribed > 10 prescriptions in a year for abiraterone or enzalutamide but to 10 or fewer beneficiaries total. High prescribers prescribed abiraterone or enzalutamide to greater than 10 beneficiaries total in the year. Solo (1–2 physicians total); Single-specialty (>2 physicians and >50% urologists); Specialty (< 50% urologists and no primary care provider); Multi-specialty (< 50% urologists and >1 primary care provider such as internal medicine, family practice, geriatrics). Practice type for urologists who were prescribers in 2016 was not available, so only practice types for those urologists prescribing these drugs in 2013–2015 is shown here.