Skip to main content
. 2019 Aug 26;57(9):e00352-19. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00352-19

FIG 2.

FIG 2

Phenotypic methodology. (A) Christensen’s urea slants. Negative-control (left), weak (middle), and positive (right) results are shown. (B) Keratin azure agar. From left to right, negative (score, 1), weak (score, 2), positive (score, 3), and strongly positive (score, 4) results are shown. (C to F) Hair perforation by the positive control, Nannizzia gypsea CBS 130813 (C, D), Trichophyton rubrum (E), and Trichophyton soudanense (F). (G, H) Tween 80 opacity; (G) negative result for T. rubrum; (H) positive result for T. violaceum.