Skip to main content
letter
. 2019 May 7;34(9):1677–1679. doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-05033-3

Table 1.

Price Changes in the Cohort of Generic Drugs for Calendar Periods 2008–2016

Calendar time 2008* 2010* 2012* 2014* 2016*
Price ratio group, n (%)
Overall (N = 1099)
  Increased in price 307 (27.9) 251 (22.8) 315 (28.6) 491 (44.6) 388 (35.3)
    1 ≤ ref < 1.10 242 (22.0) 103 (9.4) 67 (6.1) 46 (4.2) 33 (3.0)
    1.10 ≤ ref < 2 62 (5.6) 116 (10.5) 163(14.8) 264(24.0) 166 (15.1)
    2 ≤ ref < 3 2 (0.2) 19 (1.7) 42 (3.8) 80 (7.3) 77 (7.0)
    ≥ 3 ref 1 (0.1) 13 (1.2) 43 (3.9) 101 (9.2) 112 (10.1)
  Decreased in price 792 (72.0) 848 (77.1) 784 (71.3) 608 (55.3) 711 (64.6)
    0.90 < ref < 1 707 (64.3) 211 (19.1) 102 (9.3) 83 (7.5) 43 (3.9)
    0.50 < ref ≤ 0.90 84 (7.6) 606 (55.1) 571 (51.9) 393 (35.7) 273 (24.8)
    0.33 < ref ≤ 0.5 1 (0.1) 30 (2.7) 82 (7.5) 93 (8.5) 196 (17.8)
    ≤ 0.33 ref 0 (0.0) 1 (0.1) 29 (2.6) 39 (3.5) 199 (18.1)
Lowest prescription frequency group (n = 366)
  Increased in price 155 (42.3) 145 (39.6) 163 (44.5) 207 (56.5) 167 (45.6)
    1 ≤ ref < 1.10 116 (31.6) 66 (18.0) 32 (8.7) 15 (4.1) 10 (2.7)
    1.10 ≤ ref < 2 38 (10.3) 61 (16.6) 90 (24.5) 108 (29.5) 67(18.3)
    2 ≤ ref < 3 1 (0.3) 12 (3.3) 20 (5.5) 37 (10.1) 34 (9.3)
    ≥ 3 ref 0 (0.0) 6 (1.6) 21 (5.7) 47 (12.8) 56 (15.3)
  Decreased in price 211 (57.6) 221 (60.3) 203 (55.4) 159 (43.4) 199 (54.3)
    0.90 < ref < 1 175 (47.8) 78 (21.3) 44 (12.0) 28 (7.7) 18 (4.9)
    0.50 < ref ≤ 0.90 35 (9.6) 136 (37.1) 136 (37.1) 102 (27.8) 106 (28.9)
    0.33 < ref ≤ 0.5 1 (0.3) 7 (1.9) 18 (4.9) 19 (5.2) 36 (9.8)
    ≤ 0.33 ref 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 5 (1.4) 10 (2.7) 39 (10.6)
Middle prescription frequency group (n = 367)
  Increased in price 105 (28.6) 74 (20.2) 101 (27.5) 180 (49.1) 148 (40.4)
    1 ≤ ref < 1.10 84 (22.9) 29 (7.9) 21 (5.7) 20 (5.5) 9 (2.5)
    1.10 ≤ ref < 2 20 (5.5) 36 (9.8) 51 (13.9) 92 (25.1) 68 (18.5)
    2 ≤ ref < 3 1 (0.3) 5 (1.4) 14 (3.8) 31 (8.5) 35 (9.6)
    ≥ 3 ref 0 (0.0) 4 (1.1) 15 (4.1) 37 (10.1) 36 (9.8)
  Decreased in price 262 (71.5) 293 (80.0) 266 (72.6) 187 (51.0) 219 (59.8)
    0.90 < ref < 1 244 (66.6) 77 (21.0) 36 (9.8) 30 (8.2) 11 (3.0)
    0.50 < ref ≤ 0.90 18 (4.9) 211 (57.6) 209 (57.1) 134 (36.6) 96 (26.2)
    0.33 < ref ≤ 0.5 0 (0.0) 4 (1.1) 16 (4.4) 16 (4.37) 70 (19.1)
    ≤ 0.33 ref 0 (0.0) 1 (0.3) 5 (1.4) 7 (1.91) 42 (11.4)
Highest prescription frequency group (n = 366)
  Increased in price 47 (12.8) 32 (8.74) 51 (13.9) 104 (28.4) 73 (19.9)
    1 ≤ ref < 1.10 42 (11.4) 8 (2.2) 14 (3.8) 11 (3.0) 14 (3.8)
    1.10 ≤ ref < 2 4 (1.09) 19 (5.2) 22 (6.0) 64 (17.4) 31 (8.5)
    2 ≤ ref < 3 0 (0.0) 2 (0.5) 8 (2.2) 12 (3.23) 8 (2.2)
    ≥ 3 ref 1 (0.3) 3 (0.8) 7 (1.9) 17 (4.6) 20 (5.5)
  Decreased in price 319 (87.1) 334 (91.2) 315 (86.0) 262 (71.5) 293 (80.0)
    0.90 < ref < 1 288 (78.6) 56 (15.3) 22 (6.0) 25 (6.8) 14 (3.8)
    0.50 < ref ≤ 0.90 31 (8.4) 259 (70.7) 226 (61.7) 157 (42.8) 71 (19.3)
    0.33 < ref ≤ 0.5 0 (0.0) 19 (5.2) 48 (13.1) 58 (15.8) 90 (24.5)
    ≤ 0.33 ref 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 19 (5.2) 22 (6.0) 118 (32.2)

Drug-specific price ratios were estimated using prices from the first half of 2008 as reference; the cohort was comprised of 1099 generic drugs

*Data for second half of the calendar year are presented

Categories of price change ratios were calculated by dividing the price of a drug in each period by their reference (baseline) value estimated in the first half of 2008

Baseline prescribing frequency was estimated by dividing the number of study-drug dispensings by the total number of dispensings in the baseline period; using terciles, study drugs were grouped into three prescription frequency groups, with the highest tercile corresponding to the most commonly prescribed drugs