Skip to main content
. 2019 Aug 28;3(8):e00164. doi: 10.1002/pld3.164

Figure 6.

Figure 6

α‐SNAPRhg1LC protein is expressed despite RAC presence. (a) Schematic showing PIPE‐mediated removal of RAC from the native α‐SNAPRAC construct, pSM101. (b) Immunoblots of independent “Forrest” or Wm82 transgenic root lysates using previously described antibodies for α‐SNAPRhg1LC or WT α‐SNAP proteins. “+” denotes α‐SNAPRAC transformation, “−” indicates transformation with α‐SNAPRhg1LC (RAC removed), and EV is transformed with empty vector. Ponceau S staining serves as a loading control. (c) Agarose gel showing RT‐PCR amplification of mature α‐SNAPRhg1LC transcript isoforms from roots of Wm 82 or “Forrest” transformed with α‐SNAPRAC (+), or a native α‐SNAPRhg1LC cassette with RAC removed (−), or an empty vector control. WT refers to primers specific for WT α‐SNAP transcripts, LC detects full‐length α‐SNAPRhg1LC transcripts, while “Iso” amplifies a previously described α‐SNAPRhg1LC alternative transcript isoform that splices out 36 bp (Cook et al., 2014). "...": same WT‐LC‐Iso pattern