Skip to main content
. 2019 Aug 21;10:912. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2019.00912

Table 2.

Comparison of characteristics between impaired postural balance (IPB) and not impaired postural balance (NIPB) groups according to BBS.

Factors IPB NIPB p-value
Total, n 25 96
Age (y)
    Mean (SD) 76 (12.3) 69 (11.8)
    Median (IQR) 80 (63–87) 69 (61.7–79) 0.013
Sex, Male, n (%) 13 (52) 59 (62) 0.49
Stroke subtype, n (%)
    Ischemic/hemorrhage 21(84)/4(16) 87(91)/9(9) 0.46
Time post-stroke for assessment (months)
    Mean (SD) 27.7 (34.1) 24.5 (25.9) 0.635
    Median (IQR) 12 (12–23) 12 (12–12.25)
FMA-UE, Median (IQR) 58 (32–64) 65 (62–66) <0.001
FMA-LE, Median (IQR) 31 (30–34) 34 (31–34) 0.001
TUG sec, Median (IQR) 21 (17–28) 10.3 (9–12.4) <0.001

SD, standard deviation; IQR, interquartile range; FMA-UE, Fugl-Meyer Assessment Upper extremity; FMA-LE, Fugl-Meyer Assessment Lower extremity; TUG, Time Up and Go.