Skip to main content
. 2019 Aug 19;10(1):1654782. doi: 10.1080/20008198.2019.1654782

Table 1.

Characteristics of the nine studies included in the meta-analysis.

        VR treatment
Control group
     
Study Country Sample Psychiatric history/Medication (N) n Age M (SD) % male n Age M (SD) % male VR environment Sessions Control condition
Difede et al. (2007) US Firefighters, disaster relief workers, civilians with trauma related to September 11 attacks with PTSD according to DSM-IV-TR 5 (4 prolonged exposure without meaningful improvement; 1 “treated elsewhere”/2 (stable mediation) 10 40.92 (9.90) 92 8 45.13 (7.14) 88 Simulation of September 11 attacks Max. 14 (M = 7.5. SD = 3.6) Waitlist
Gamito et al. (2010) Portugal Portuguese colonial war veterans with PTSD according to DSM-IV n. r./stable medication 4 whole sample: age (M = 63.5, SD = 4.43) 100 3 n. r. 100 Simulation of unspecified wartime environments (dense vegetation) 12 Waitlist
Ready et al. (2010) US Vietnam war veterans with CAPS > 60 all were in Veterans Affairs treatment > 3 months/stable medication 5 57 (3.02) 100 4 58 (3.05) 100 Simulation of Vietnam wartime environments 10 Present-centred therapy
McLay et al. (2011) US Active duty military personnel with past Iraq or Afghanistan deployment with PTSD (according to Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview and CAPS > 40) n. r./n. r. 10 28 (Range: 22–43) 90 10 28.8 (Range: 21–45) 100 Simulation of Iraq and Afghanistan wartime environments M = 8.8 Treatment as usual in Veterans Affairs Facilities
Miyahira et al. (2012) US Active duty military personnel with past Iraq or Afghanistan deployment with PTSD symptoms n. r./n. r. 10 n. r. 95 (before dropouts) 10 n. r. 95 (before dropouts) Simulation of unspecified wartime environments 10 Minimal attention (only telephone contacts every 2 weeks)*
Roy et al. (2014) US Active duty military personnel/veterans with Iraq or Afghanistan deployment with CAPS > 40 n. r./n. r. 9 34.5 (n. r.) 88 10 34.1 (n. r.) 100 Simulation of Iraq and Afghanistan wartime environments 12 Imaginal exposure
Cárdenas-López et al. (2015) Mexico Civilians with crime-related trauma experience with CAPS > 40 n. r./none 10 28.1 (14.9) 50 10 39.8 (15.96) 30 Simulation of unsafe locations in Ciudad Juarez (Mexico) 10 Imaginal exposure
Reger et al. (2016) US Active duty military personnel with past Iraq or Afghanistan deployment with PTSD according to DSM-IV-TR 53/stable medication 30 29.52 (6.47) 96 32 30.89 (7.90) 94 Simulation of Iraq and Afghanistan wartime environments 10 Imaginal exposure
47 30.39 (7.09) 98 Waitlist
McLay et al. (2017) US Active duty military personnel with past Iraq or Afghanistan deployment with PTSD according to DSM-IV and CAPS > 40 n. r./n. r. 36 33 (8.33) 93 38 32 (7.71) 100 Simulation of Iraq and Afghanistan wartime environments M = 10.28 Control exposure, with stimuli being presented as computer images

Reported sample sizes are completer samples. n. r. = not reported. CAPS = Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale. *treated as waitlist control condition in our analysis participants were allocated to two control groups (imaginal exposure or waitlist).