Table 5. Summary of standardized direct and indirect effects of socio-demographic, parental behavioural factors on condom use self-efficacy.

		Self-efficacy for condom purchase and use		Partner communication efficacy
		Std. Coeff	SE	Std. Coeff	SE
Sexual Experience: Had Sex
	Total Effect	0.73***	0.39	0.08	0.13
	Direct Effect	0.73***	0.39	0.08	0.13
Lifestyle Behavioural
	Total Effect	-0.06	0.07	-0.10	0.04
	Direct Effect	-0.06	0.07	-0.10	0.04
Sex: Male
	Total Effect	0.31***	0.05	-0.01	0.03
	Indirect Effect	-0.11**	0.07	-0.02	0.01
	Direct Effect	0.42***	0.07	0.02	0.04
Age Group: 20–34 years
	Total Effect	0.08*	0.06	-0.04	0.04
	Indirect Effect	0.36***	0.13	0.03	0.04
	Direct Effect	-0.29***	0.13	-0.07	0.06
Education
	Total Effect	0.07	0.02	-0.01	0.02
	Indirect Effect	0.02	0.02	-0.01	0.00
	Direct Effect	0.05	0.03	-0.01	0.02
Family Support: Received Support
	Total Effect	0.01	0.08	0.08**	0.05
	Indirect Effect	-0.04*	0.05	0.01	0.01
	Direct Effect	0.04	0.08	0.07**	0.05
Importance of Religion
	Total Effect	-0.17***	0.05	-0.01	0.03
	Indirect Effect	-0.09**	0.05	0.02	0.02
	Direct Effect	-0.08*	0.06	-0.03	0.03
Sex Education with Father: Yes
	Total Effect	0.05	0.06	0.01	0.04
	Indirect Effect	0.06	0.07	0.00	0.01
	Direct Effect	-0.01	0.08	0.01	0.04
Sex Education with Mother: Yes
	Total Effect	0.04	0.05	0.05	0.03
	Indirect Effect	0.06	0.05	0.01	0.01
	Direct Effect	-0.01	0.06	0.04	0.03
Recruitment Site: Nasarawa
	Total Effect	0.06*	0.05	0.33***	0.04
	Indirect Effect	0.06	0.06	0.03	0.02
	Direct Effect	0.01	0.07	0.30***	0.04

Note

*** p < 0.001

** p < 0.01

* p < 0.05