Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Aug 28.
Published in final edited form as: J Phys Act Health. 2019 Aug 1;16(8):608–615. doi: 10.1123/jpah.2018-0632

Table 2.

Hierarchical Logistic Regression Models Predicting Physical Activity Outcomes (N=4,901)

Coefficients 60 min/day
OR (95% C.I.)
Muscle Strengthening
OR (95% C.I.)
Fixed Effects
Follow-up 0.89 (0.69, 1.13) 0.75 (0.60, 0.93)**
Intervention 1.03 (0.73, 1.45) 1.67 (0.96, 2.90)
Follow-up × Intervention 0.97 (0.71, 1.32) 0.72 (0.54, 0.95)*
High PA Attitudes 1.86 (1.48, 2.33)*** 1.63 (1.37, 1.94)***
High PA Enjoyment 1.07 (0.88, 1.29) 1.20 (1.02, 1.42)*
Fitness Level 1.19 (1.01, 1.40)* 1.36 (1.17, 1.58)***
Female 0.61 (0.52, 0.70)*** 0.76 (0.67, 0.87)***
Latinx 0.81 (0.69, 0.95)* 1.02 (0.87, 1.18)
High Family Support 1.85 (1.56, 2.18)*** 1.75 (1.47, 2.07)***
High Friend Support 1.47 (1.24, 1.75)*** 1.93 (1.63, 2.29)***
High Barriers 0.66 (0.54, 0.80)*** 0.75 (0.64, 0.87)***
High Benefits 1.17 (0.98, 1.39)*** 1.09 (0.94, 1.26)
BMI1 Category
  Underweight 0.95 (0.61, 1.45) 0.77 (0.52, 1.15)
  Healthy weight (ref)
  Overweight 0.91 (0.75, 1.10) 1.04 (0.87, 1.24)
  Obese 0.75 (0.61, 0.92)** 0.81 (0.67, 0.96)*
Random Effects
School Level Error 0.066*** 0.271***
 Variance1
*

p < 0.05,

**

p < 0.01,

***

p < 0.001

1

BMI = Body Mass Index

2

Significance of school level error variance were tested using likelihood ratio tests.