Table 3.

Hierarchical Logistic Regression Models Predicting PA¹ Attitudes, PE Enjoyment, and Fitness Level² (N=4,901)

Coefficients	High PA Attitudes OR (95% C.I.)	High PE Enjoyment OR (95% C.I.)	Fitness Level3 OR (95% C.I.)
Fixed Effects
Follow-up	1.09 (0.86, 1.39)	0.84 (0.59, 1.20)	0.6 (0.47, 0.77)***
Intervention	0.96 (0.77, 1.20)	0.57 (0.39, 0.85)**	1.35 (0.71, 2.58)
Follow-up × Intervention	0.76 (0.56, 1.04)	2.04 (1.29, 3.24)**	1.82 (1.35, 2.47)***
Female	0.52 (0.44, 0.60)***	0.51 (0.36, 0.72)***	0.74 (0.64, 0.85)***
Latinx	1.24 (1.06, 1.46)**	1.17 (1.00, 1.37)	0.95 (0.81, 1.11)
High Family Support	2.02 (1.62, 2.51)***	1.14 (0.95, 1.36)	1.13 (0.95, 1.34)
High Friend Support	2.00 (1.63, 2.47)***	1.36 (1.14, 1.64)*	0.98 (0.82, 1.16)
High Barriers	0.28 (0.24, 0.33)***	0.40 (0.35, 0.47)***	0.67 (0.57, 0.79)***
High Benefits	2.37 (2.03, 2.76)***	1.74 (1.50, 2.02)***	1.24 (1.06, 1.45)**
BMI Category
Underweight	0.94 (0.59, 1.49)	0.88 (0.58, 1.34)	0.51 (0.34, 0.75)**
Healthy weight (ref)
Overweight	0.82 (0.67, 0.99)*	0.97 (0.80, 1.16)	0.32 (0.27, 0.38)***
Obese	0.73 (0.60, 0.88)**	0.96 (0.81, 1.15)	0.08 (0.06, 0.11)***
Female × Follow-up	---	1.45 (0.92, 2.31)	---
Female × Intervention	---	1.07 (0.70, 1.63)	---
Female × Intervention × Follow-up	---	0.54 (0.30, 0.98)*	---
Random Effects
School Level Error	0.000	0.044***	0.375***
Variance1

^*p < 0.05,

^**p < 0.01,

^***p < 0.001

¹PA=Physical Activity, PE = Physical Education, BMI = Body Mass Index

²Significance of school level error variance were tested using likelihood ratio tests.

³Due to missing data in the Fitnessgram variable, the sample size for this analysis is 4,256.