Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Transplantation. 2019 Sep;103(9):1821–1833. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000002744

Table 1:

Animal demographics

Animal ID Age (years) Weight (kg) Sex
Brain Death Group (n=12)
RH2016 17.8 10.3 Female
RHAS84 20.8 10.3 Female
RH2603 16.8 8.0 Female
RH2602 16.7 8.4 Female
RH2030 21.2 11.4 Female
R12072 3.9 5.5 Male
RH2609 6.3 5.3 Female
RH2715 5.8 5.9 Female
RH2626 7.2 9.4 Male
RH2728 6.9 10.3 Male
RH2638 11.0 10.9 Female
RH2731 7.3 11.3 Male
Average 11.8 ± 6.4 8.9 ± 2.3
Sham Procedure (n=5)
R12072 4.2 5.5 Male
RH2609 6.5 5.3 Female
RH1966 19.5 11.0 Female
RH2620 13.0 13.4 Male
RH2618 6.0 9.9 Male
Average 9.8 ± 6.4 9.0 ± 3.5
Naïve (n=10)
R13009 3.8 6.6 Male
R11107 3.9 6.6 Male
R11051 4.4 7.4 Male
RH2613 3.7 5.1 Female
RH2610 4.8 5.9 Female
RH2612 3.9 5.1 Female
NHP40 16.9 11.2 Female
NHP46 21.0 14.2 Male
NHP54 18 -- Female
NHP55 19 -- Female
Average 9.9 ± 7.6 7.8 ± 3.2

Animals R12072 and RH2609 underwent the Sham procedure prior to being assigned to the Brain Death group.

Individual animal ID, weight, age, sex, according to group. There were no significant differences between groups as tested by 1-way ANOVA with Bonferonni correction.