Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Aug 29.
Published in final edited form as: Food Public Health. 2018;8(4):79–85.

Table 2.

Descriptive characteristics by residence in a food desert census tract in the REGARDS Study, 2003–2007a

Participant characteristics Not a food desert
(n=16,294)
Food desert
(n=2,885)
p-value
Age, y, mean (SD) 64.9 (9.3) 64.7 (9.1) 0.29
Sex, n (%) <0.01
 Male 7,287 (44.7) 1,170 (40.6)
 Female 9,007 (55.3) 1,715 (59.5)
Race, n (%) <0.01
 Black 4,921 (30.2) 1,644 (57.0)
 White 11,373 (69.8) 1,241 (43.0)
Income, n (%) <0.01
 Less than $20k 2,306 (14.2) 707 (24.5)
 $20k–34k 3,800 (23.3) 781 (27.1)
 $35k–$74k 5,224 (32.1) 800 (27.7)
 $75k and above 3,030 (18.6) 273 (9.5)
 Refused 1,934 (11.9) 324 (11.2)
Education, n (%) <0.01
 Less than high school 1,389 (8.5) 437 (15.2)
 High School graduate 8,453 (51.9) 1,627 (56.4)
 College graduate or above 6,452 (39.6) 821 (28.5)
Region, n (%) <0.01
 Southeastb 8,746 (53.7) 1,887 (65.4)
 Outside the southeast 7,548 (46.3) 998 (34.6)
RUCA, n (%) 0.03
 Isolated or Small rural 1,453 (8.9) 258 (8.9)
 Large rural 2,033 (12.5) 310 (10.8)
 Urban 12,808 (78.6) 2,317 (80.3)
Relationship Status, n (%) <0.01
 Married 10,236 (62.8) 1,534 (53.2)
 Divorced 2,232 (13.7) 480 (16.6)
 Other 276 (1.7) 80 (2.8)
 Single 817 (5.0) 181 (6.3)
 Widowed 2,733 (16.8) 610 (21.1)
a

There were 30,239 participants in the REGARDS study; 56 anomalies were excluded, 2,906 were excluded for missing geocodes, 8.090 for missing dietary information, and 8 for missing covariates, which left 19,179 for the current analysis. RUCA, rural-ruban commuting area; REGARDS, REasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke

b

Southeast: Louisiana, Arkansas, Mississippi, Alabama, Tennessee, Georgia, North Carolina, South Carolina