Skip to main content
. 2018 Nov 2;1(2):e10763. doi: 10.2196/10763

Table 1.

Comparisons between the latent class analyses with different number of latent classes.

Model selection criteria ka=2 k=3 k=4 k=5 k=6
The minimum percentage of 1 class 44.50 22.8 15.46 10.50 7.17
The mean posterior class membership probabilityb >0.96 >0.91 >0.83 >0.78 >0.77
Entropy 0.84 0.82 0.78 0.77 0.79
Bootstrap likelihood ratio test (k vs k-1)-2 log likelihood (degrees of freedom) 5057.04 (16)c 1010.30 (16)c 274.03 (16)c 182.95 (16)c 141.77 (16)c
Akaike information criteria 27,465.22 26,486.93 26,244.90 26,093.95 25,984.18
Bayesian information criteria 27,639.12 26,750.59 26,598.32 26,537.13 26,517.12

ak: number of latent classes.

bThe model with k=2 was selected as the final model considering the highest posterior class membership probability, entropy, statistically significant difference from the model with k=3, and interpretability (ie, more distinctive internet use behaviors between classes).

cP<.001.