Table 1.
Comparisons between the latent class analyses with different number of latent classes.
| Model selection criteria | ka=2 | k=3 | k=4 | k=5 | k=6 |
| The minimum percentage of 1 class | 44.50 | 22.8 | 15.46 | 10.50 | 7.17 |
| The mean posterior class membership probabilityb | >0.96 | >0.91 | >0.83 | >0.78 | >0.77 |
| Entropy | 0.84 | 0.82 | 0.78 | 0.77 | 0.79 |
| Bootstrap likelihood ratio test (k vs k-1)-2 log likelihood (degrees of freedom) | 5057.04 (16)c | 1010.30 (16)c | 274.03 (16)c | 182.95 (16)c | 141.77 (16)c |
| Akaike information criteria | 27,465.22 | 26,486.93 | 26,244.90 | 26,093.95 | 25,984.18 |
| Bayesian information criteria | 27,639.12 | 26,750.59 | 26,598.32 | 26,537.13 | 26,517.12 |
ak: number of latent classes.
bThe model with k=2 was selected as the final model considering the highest posterior class membership probability, entropy, statistically significant difference from the model with k=3, and interpretability (ie, more distinctive internet use behaviors between classes).
cP<.001.