Skip to main content
Microbiology Resource Announcements logoLink to Microbiology Resource Announcements
. 2019 Aug 29;8(35):e00831-19. doi: 10.1128/MRA.00831-19

Whole-Genome Sequences of 35 Incompatibility Group I1 Plasmid-Carrying Salmonella enterica Isolates from Food Animal and Clinical Sources

Nesreen H Aljahdali a,b, Pravin R Kaldhone a, Steven L Foley a, Bijay K Khajanchi a,
Editor: David A Baltrusc
PMCID: PMC6715874  PMID: 31467104

We sequenced 35 Salmonella enterica isolates carrying incompatibility group I1 (IncI1) plasmids from different serotypes to study their genotypic characteristics. The isolates originated from food animals (n = 32) and human patients (n = 3). All isolates carried IncI1 plasmids, and many had additional plasmids detected along with virulence and antimicrobial resistance genes.

ABSTRACT

We sequenced 35 Salmonella enterica isolates carrying incompatibility group I1 (IncI1) plasmids from different serotypes to study their genotypic characteristics. The isolates originated from food animals (n = 32) and human patients (n = 3). All isolates carried IncI1 plasmids, and many had additional plasmids detected along with virulence and antimicrobial resistance genes.

ANNOUNCEMENT

Bacterial foodborne pathogens such as Salmonella enterica contribute to significant morbidity and mortality worldwide (1). Patients with more severe manifestations of illness often require antimicrobial treatment for resolution of disease (2). Unfortunately, several Salmonella strains are resistant to antimicrobial therapy, and often, this resistance is encoded on plasmids (3). Several plasmid types, including members of the incompatibility group I1 (IncI1), have been implicated in carrying antimicrobial resistance genes (4). Additionally, IncI1 plasmids have been reported to carry genes that may increase the virulence of strains where they reside (4). The aim of this study was to assess the antimicrobial resistance and virulence gene content of IncI1-positive Salmonella. We sequenced 35 Salmonella enterica isolates originating from cattle (n = 12, 34%), swine (n = 4, 11%), turkey (n = 6, 17%), chicken (n = 6, 17%), a chicken farm environment (n = 4, 11%), and human patients (n = 3, 9%). These isolates were collected from different locations in the United States during the period from 1999 to 2009. Isolates selected belong to Salmonella enterica serovars Heidelberg (n = 12, 34%), Typhimurium (n = 10, 29%), Newport (n = 6, 17%), Kentucky (n = 3, 9%), Anatum (n = 1, 3%), Dublin (n = 1, 3%), Cerro (n = 1, 3%), and Montevideo (n = 1, 3%).

Isolation approaches and phenotypic characterization of the isolates were described previously (5). We sequenced 35 Salmonella enterica isolates identified as carrying IncI1 plasmids using PCR-based plasmid replicon typing in our previous study (6). Each of the 35 isolates was stored at −80°C in brain heart infusion broth (Remel, Lenexa, KS) containing 20% glycerol, and prior to sequencing, isolates were subcultured on blood agar plates (tryptic soy agar with 5% sheep’s blood; Remel). All plates were incubated at 35°C for 24 hours. Overnight bacterial growth from individual isolates was scraped from the plate with a 1-μl inoculating loop and added to 180 μl animal tissue lysis (ATL) buffer (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA). Next, bacterial genomic DNA was extracted using a DNeasy blood and tissue kit (Qiagen). The quality and quantity of the DNA were examined using a NanoDrop instrument (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Grand Island, NY, USA) and a Qubit broad range (BR) assay kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific). DNA libraries were generated using 1 ng of DNA from each sample using the Nextera XT DNA library preparation kit (Illumina, San Diego, CA) and were multiplexed using combinations of two indexes of the Nextera XT index kit (Illumina). Isolates were sequenced in two batches with a maximum of 19 isolates per run. DNA sample libraries were diluted, denatured, and loaded onto the Illumina MiSeq instrument, and sequencing was performed using the v2 500-cycle kits. The two runs were monitored using a sequence analysis viewer with an emphasis on appropriate cluster densities of 1,193,000/mm2 with the final quality score (>Q30 score of 80.41) and 1,326,000/mm2 with the final quality score (>Q30 score of 80.66). FASTQ files were demultiplexed with MiSeq software, and the reads for each isolate were assembled using CLC Genomics Workbench ver. 9.0 (Qiagen, Redwood City, CA). Sequences were annotated initially using the Pathosystems Resource Integration Center (PATRIC) software version 3.5.36 (7). Subsequently, sequences were submitted to NCBI for final annotation through the Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline (PGAP) to annotate the draft genomes of these strains (8). The numbers of contigs, assembly sizes, coding sequences (CDS), and GC contents were annotated by PATRIC as shown in Table 1. The final annotations performed by the PGAP are available in NCBI under the accession numbers shown in Table 1.

TABLE 1.

Whole-genome sequencing analyses of 35 Salmonella enterica isolates from food animal and clinical sources

Isolate Serotype Source Yr of isolation No. of sequence reads N50 (bp) No. of contigs Genome length (bp) No. of CDS G+C content (%) Accession no.
67 Newport Cattle 2002 5,019,561 25,424 485 4,486,820 4,678 52.15 VCBN00000000
74 Newport Cattle 2002 4,989,252 25,085 420 4,328,188 4,481 52.22 VCBO00000000
76 Newport Chicken 2001 4,926,523 32,358 343 4,349,537 4,475 52.15 VCBP00000000
89 Newport Swine 2001 4,977,554 26,443 407 4,620,558 4,755 52.18 VCIK00000000
93 Newport Swine 2002 5,027,143 32,187 320 4,403,717 4,586 52.10 VCIL00000000
100 Newport Turkey 2001 4,837,174 42,117 294 4,355,301 4,419 52.15 VCIM00000000
111 Heidelberg Cattle 2001 5,182,383 29,076 363 4,895,560 5,076 51.95 VCIN00000000
114 Heidelberg Cattle 2002 5,138,950 22,618 517 4,917,806 5,123 52.00 VCIO00000000
115 Heidelberg Cattle 2002 5,191,943 45,514 263 4,657,342 4,803 51.96 VCIP00000000
116 Heidelberg Cattle 2002 5,248,272 30,402 385 4,895,176 5,115 51.82 VCIQ00000000
159 Heidelberg Turkey 2002 5,111,403 31,495 310 4,737,325 4,924 51.78 VCIR00000000
470 Typhimurium Swine 1999 8,612,134 7,828 425 4,407,658 4,610 52.42 VCSK00000000
471 Typhimurium Swine 1999 5,001,947 20,290 490 4,718,137 4,882 52.32 VCIT00000000
482 Typhimurium Turkey 1999 4,960,480 24,216 417 4,670,043 4,763 52.22 VCIU00000000
695 Heidelberg Turkey 2000 5,071,071 28,231 380 4,907,961 5,026 51.96 VCIV00000000
706 Heidelberg Turkey 2000 4,897,846 25,101 405 4,522,077 4,649 52.13 VDBX00000000
715 Heidelberg Turkey 2000 4,848,412 36,230 279 4,613,597 4,714 52.15 VCPT00000000
121 Heidelberg Cattle 2002 4,846,037 36,611 379 4,843,682 5,006 52.23 VCSL00000000
N134 Typhimurium Chicken farm Unknown 5,086,478 92,540 130 4,508,660 4,683 52.00 VCQG00000000
N53 Typhimurium Chicken Unknown 5,049,701 19,622 577 4,912,152 5,091 52.23 VCQH00000000
849 Dublin Cattle 2005 5,047,829 42,899 236 4,599,915 4,802 51.99 VCPU00000000
855 Typhimurium Cattle 2006 5,014,625 49,906 226 4,499,875 4,632 52.05 VCPV00000000
856 Cerro Cattle 2006 4,568,478 21,626 437 4,470,137 4,521 52.42 VCPW00000000
N865 Kentucky Chicken 2008 4,879,802 23,260 503 4,523,952 4,615 52.08 VCQJ00000000
880 Montevideo Cattle 2006 4,694,168 43,514 282 4,251,545 4,350 52.34 VCIS00000000
891 Anatum Cattle 2006 4,741,580 28,637 300 4,601,255 4,657 52.18 VCPY00000000
990 Heidelberg Human 2008 5,098,170 33,395 303 4,892,063 5,061 51.85 VCQK00000000
1000 Heidelberg Human 2009 5,087,599 23,713 453 4,773,954 4,962 51.87 VCPZ00000000
1163 Heidelberg Human 2007 4,950,681 49,656 344 4,678,168 4,854 52.01 VCQB00000000
N822 Kentucky Chicken farm 2008 4,891,568 23,503 511 4,533,159 4,691 52.12 VCQI00000000
N860 Kentucky Chicken 2008 4,880,247 27,698 417 4,486,160 4,589 52.02 VDBM00000000
N136 Typhimurium Chicken farm Unknown 5,082,919 41,441 275 4,700,886 4,820 52.02 VCQC00000000
N74 Typhimurium Chicken Unknown 5,099,545 35,108 326 4,587,257 4,780 51.88 VCQD00000000
N82 Typhimurium Chicken farm Unknown 5,056,644 22,986 497 4,740,914 4,928 52.12 VCQE00000000
N97 Typhimurium Chicken Unknown 5,054,428 36,102 279 4,729,717 4,859 52.04 VCQF00000000

Sequence data from each of the isolates were further analyzed using the PlasmidFinder (9) and ResFinder (10) tools to predict the presence of plasmids and antimicrobial resistance genes, respectively. PlasmidFinder analyses confirmed that all isolates contained IncI1 plasmids, many along with other plasmid replicon types, including IncA/C (n = 14, 40%), IncHI2 (n = 8, 23%), IncColpVC (n = 9, 26%), IncX1 (n = 7, 20%), and IncFIB (n = 6, 17%). ResFinder analyses were performed by selecting acquired antimicrobial resistance genes with default parameter settings. Multiple antimicrobial resistance genes, including tet(A) in 51% (n = 18) of the strains, followed by blaCMY-2 (n = 17, 49%), aph(3ʺ)-Ib (n = 16, 46%), sul2 (n = 14, 40%), fosA7 (n = 12, 34%), aadA1 (n = 12, 34%), floR (n = 10, 29%), sul1 (n = 9, 26%), tet(B) (n = 9, 26%), blaTEM-1B (n = 8, 23%), dfrA1 (n = 4, 11%), blaTEM-1A (n = 1, 3%), sul3 (n = 1, 3%), dfrA2 (n = 1, 3%), cml (n = 1, 3%), and cmlA1 (n = 1, 3%), were most commonly detected among the sequences. Default parameters were used for all bioinformatic software tools unless otherwise specified.

Data availability.

This whole-genome shotgun project has been deposited at DDBJ/ENA/GenBank under the accession numbers listed in Table 1, and the SRA submission of the FASTQ files has been recorded under the accession number PRJNA543125.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We recognize Rajesh Nayak for the provision of some of the isolates in the study and Ashraf Khan, Jing Han, and Carl Cerniglia for their critical review of the manuscript.

This project was supported by the National Center for Toxicological Research and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Nesreen H. Aljahdali and Pravin R. Kaldhone are supported through the Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education (ORISE). The opinions expressed in the manuscript are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views and policy of the Food and Drug Administration or Department of Health and Human Services. Reference to any commercial material, equipment, or process does not in any way constitute approval, endorsement, or recommendation by the Food and Drug Administration.

REFERENCES

  • 1.CDC. 2012. National Salmonella surveillance. https://www.cdc.gov/nationalsurveillance/salmonella-surveillance.html.
  • 2.Han J, David DE, Deck J, Lynne AM, Kaldhone P, Nayak R, Stefanova R, Foley SL. 2011. Comparison of Salmonella enterica serovar Heidelberg isolates from human patients with those from animal and food sources. J Clin Microbiol 49:1130–1133. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01931-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Han J, Lynne AM, David DE, Tang HL, Xu JS, Nayak R, Kaldhone P, Logue CM, Foley SL. 2012. DNA sequence analysis of plasmids from multidrug resistant Salmonella enterica serotype Heidelberg isolates. PloS One 7:e51160. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0051160. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Smith H, Bossers A, Harders F, Wu GH, Woodford N, Schwarz S, Guerra B, Rodriguez I, van Essen-Zandbergen A, Brouwer M, Mevius D. 2015. Characterization of epidemic IncI1-I gamma plasmids harboring Ambler class A and C genes in Escherichia coli and Salmonella enterica from animals and humans. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 59:5357–5365. doi: 10.1128/AAC.05006-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Foley SL, Johnson TJ, Ricke SC, Nayak R, Danzeisen J. 2013. Salmonella pathogenicity and host adaptation in chicken-associated serovars. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 77:582–607. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.00015-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Kaldhone PR, Han J, Deck J, Khajanchi B, Nayak R, Foley SL, Ricke SC. 2018. Evaluation of the genetics and functionality of plasmids in incompatibility group I1-positive Salmonella enterica. Foodborne Pathog Dis 15:168–176. doi: 10.1089/fpd.2017.2332. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Wattam AR, Abraham D, Dalay O, Disz TL, Driscoll T, Gabbard JL, Gillespie JJ, Gough R, Hix D, Kenyon R, Machi D, Mao CH, Nordberg EK, Olson R, Overbeek R, Pusch GD, Shukla M, Schulman J, Stevens RL, Sullivan DE, Vonstein V, Warren A, Will R, Wilson MJC, Yoo HS, Zhang CD, Zhang Y, Sobral BW. 2014. PATRIC, the bacterial bioinformatics database and analysis resource. Nucleic Acids Res 42:D581–D591. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkt1099. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Tatusova T, DiCuccio M, Badretdin A, Chetvernin V, Nawrocki EP, Zaslavsky L, Lomsadze A, Pruitt K, Borodovsky M, Ostell J. 2016. NCBI Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline. Nucleic Acids Res 44:6614–6624. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw569. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Carattoli A, Zankari E, Garcia-Fernandez A, Larsen MV, Lund O, Villa L, Aarestrup FM, Hasman H. 2014. In silico detection and typing of plasmids using PlasmidFinder and plasmid multilocus sequence typing. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 58:3895–3903. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02412-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Zankari E, Hasman H, Cosentino S, Vestergaard M, Rasmussen S, Lund O, Aarestrup FM, Larsen MV. 2012. Identification of acquired antimicrobial resistance genes. J Antimicrob Chemother 67:2640–2644. doi: 10.1093/jac/dks261. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

This whole-genome shotgun project has been deposited at DDBJ/ENA/GenBank under the accession numbers listed in Table 1, and the SRA submission of the FASTQ files has been recorded under the accession number PRJNA543125.


Articles from Microbiology Resource Announcements are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES