Table 2.
Summary of intervention effects on psychosocial outcomes.
| Study | Psychosocial outcomes | Behavior change theories | ||||||||
| Social support | PAa self-efficacy | PA motivation | Barriers to PA | PA enjoyment | Outcome expectations | Perceived benefits of PA | Perceived PA competency | |||
| App-alone studies | ||||||||||
|
|
Arrogi et al, 2017 [40] | —b | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | SCTc, CTd |
| Bond et al, 2014 [48] | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Choi et al, 2016 [38] | [-]e | [-] | — | [++]f | — | — | — | — | SCT | |
| Cowdery et al, 2015 [39] | — | — | [-] | — | [-] | — | — | [-] | SDTg | |
| Fanning et al, 2017 [41] | — | [-] | — | [+]h | — | [-] | — | — | SCT | |
| Glynn et al, 2014 [36] | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Korinek et al, 2018 [50] | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | SCT | |
| Pellegrini et al, 2015 [49] | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Simons et al, 2018 [42] | [-] | [-] | — | [-] | — | — | [-] | — | ASEi | |
| Walsh et al, 2016 [37] | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | COM-Bj | |
| App Web-based social networking studies | ||||||||||
|
|
Al Ayubi et al, 2014 [43] | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | SCT, TRAk |
| Foster et al, 2010 [44] | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Hurkmanns et al, 2018 [47] | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Pope et al, 2018 [46] | [+] | [+] | — | — | [+] | — | — | — | SCT | |
| Torquati, Kolbe-Alexander et al, 2018 [45] | [-] | [-] | — | — | — | — | — | — | SCT, GSTl, CT | |
aPA: physical activity.
bNot applicable.
cSCT: Social Cognitive Theory.
dCT: Control Theory.
eNo improvement in outcome.
fSignificant between-group improvement in outcome.
gSDT: Self-Determination Theory.
hSignificant within-group improvement in outcome.
iASE: Attitude-social Influence Self-efficacy Model.
jCOM-B: The Capability, Opportunity, Motivation, Behavior framework.
kTRA: The Theory of Reasoned Action.
lGST: Goal setting Theory.